Re: Eastmond at FT : Sat Mar 12, 2011 2:53 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

:lol:

Explain to me the difference please.

Re: Eastmond at FT : Sat Mar 12, 2011 2:54 pm  

St pete wrote:

I fail to see the difference ...

St pete wrote:

I fail to see what Graham has won ...

St. pete wrote:

I fail to see how what's he's done in the past...

Do you see .... anything at all?

Re: Eastmond at FT : Sat Mar 12, 2011 2:59 pm  

Mugwump wrote:

Do you see .... anything at all?

So that gives him the rite to be treated better than players that ain't won things?

Would you still feel the same if he went to Wigan or Warrington?

If he signed for the pies would you pat him on the back and say you've won cups with us, your established player and paid saints your dues so good luck in the cherry and White?

Re: Eastmond at FT : Sat Mar 12, 2011 3:10 pm  

St pete wrote:

So that gives him the rite to be treated better than players that ain't won things?

Would you still feel the same if he went to Wigan or Warrington?

If he signed for the pies would you pay him on the back and say you've won cups with us, your established player and paid saints your dues so good luck in the cherry and White?

Graham has earned the right (through his commitment, passion, relationship with the supporters and consistent level of professionalism) to go where he likes without criticism from me.

That's not to say I wouldn't boo him in a Wigan shirt.

Clearly you do not believe that a player can earn respect through his actions on and off the field. I find this weird. But I've known weirder.

Re: Eastmond at FT : Sat Mar 12, 2011 3:21 pm  

Mugwump wrote:

Graham has earned the right (through his commitment, passion, relationship with the supporters and consistent level of professionalism) to go where he likes without criticism from me.

That's not to say I wouldn't boo him in a Wigan shirt.

Clearly you do not believe that a player can earn respect through his actions on and off the field. I find this weird. But I've known weirder.

Graham has earned the respect of the fans but that shouldn't effect the way we treat him. He's done the same thing Kyle has done and not yet come out and said he wants to stay.

To say he's earned his rite to leave and join Wigan IMO is weird but I've known weirder.

On another note, I respect any decision they both make, if Kyle can make a better life for himself by going to union then I wish him all the best. He's here to make a living and same goes for jammer but to boo one player and cheer the other is weird but I've known weirder.

Re: Eastmond at FT : Sat Mar 12, 2011 3:25 pm  

St pete wrote:

So that gives him the rite to be treated better than players that ain't won things?

Would you still feel the same if he went to Wigan or Warrington?

If he signed for the pies would you pat him on the back and say you've won cups with us, your established player and paid saints your dues so good luck in the cherry and White?

Yes.

Re: Eastmond at FT : Sat Mar 12, 2011 3:30 pm  

With Eastmond at the wheel you heading down the highway to the dangerzone.

Re: Eastmond at FT : Sat Mar 12, 2011 3:45 pm  

SaintMarshy wrote:

Yes.

I'd agree!

Re: Eastmond at FT : Sat Mar 12, 2011 3:48 pm  

Dei Morti Viventi wrote:

With Eastmond at the wheel you heading down the highway to the dangerzone.

Hmmm okay

Re: Eastmond at FT : Sat Mar 12, 2011 5:09 pm  

St pete wrote:

Graham has earned the respect of the fans but that shouldn't effect the way we treat him. He's done the same thing Kyle has done and not yet come out and said he wants to stay.

When was Kyle voted Man of Steel? When was he best metre maker for two years running? How often has Kyle been chosen for representative honours or as a member of the dream team? How many times has Kyle fired up the pack to move forward when we were being pounded by Wigan or Leeds? James Graham has more than earned his right to make up his mind about his future in his own time. Kyle Eastmond has not. That is the difference.