Re: Well done Rangi : Tue Oct 25, 2011 11:52 am  

bensbag wrote:

Is that a general well done on his performance or a well done for actually completing a game without attempting to end someones career ?

Re: Well done Rangi : Tue Oct 25, 2011 12:08 pm  

bren2k wrote:

Who said it was worse than any of those things?

The old 'is it because I is from Cas?' routine had already been stretched to breaking point and you've just taken it into the realms of ridiculousness.

How many times do I have to tell you that an objection to non-English people playing for England is not a criticism of the team they happen to play their club football for?!

Really, you're just making yourself look thick.

p.s Georgie - once again, I'm just responding to the discussion; if your mods think it should take place in the other thread, I'm sure they'll tidy things up.

My post was in fact based on the premise that your objections are nothing to do with Castleford - the clue was kind of in the first sentence if you care to read it. However, as you seemingly didn't read it, and subsequently offered no response whatsoever to the valid questions I went on to ask, I can only assume it's not me who's "thick".

(Yes, I know. Name calling is never a substitute for reasoned argument, but as you're not actually putting forward any reasoned argument it's tough to maintain one's standards...)

Anyway, that'll do me on the subject. Once again... well done Rangi.

Re: Well done Rangi : Tue Oct 25, 2011 3:54 pm  

Disco wrote:

My post was in fact based on the premise that your objections are nothing to do with Castleford - the clue was kind of in the first sentence if you care to read it. However, as you seemingly didn't read it, and subsequently offered no response whatsoever to the valid questions I went on to ask, I can only assume it's not me who's "thick".

(Yes, I know. Name calling is never a substitute for reasoned argument, but as you're not actually putting forward any reasoned argument it's tough to maintain one's standards...)

Anyway, that'll do me on the subject. Once again... well done Rangi.

Surely I don't need to spell it out for you?

If I disagree with Chase's inclusion in the England team because he isn't English, and it's not a Cas issue, then logic would suggest that I feel the same way about all the other players you've listed. I would have thought that was too obvious to require an answer?

For the record - I disagree with players of any sport playing fast and loose with their nationality for the sake of getting a shot that they otherwise wouldn't have got.

And once again - I still don't think it was a MotM performance.

Re: Well done Rangi : Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:09 pm  

bren2k wrote:

And once again - I still don't think it was a MotM performance.

On a thread marked "Well done Rangi"

D-O I H-A-V-E T-O S-P-E-L-L I-T O-U-T ??

Re: Well done Rangi : Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:11 pm  

Georgie Best on a Bloomer wrote:

On a thread marked "Well done Rangi"

D-O I H-A-V-E T-O S-P-E-L-L I-T O-U-T ??

Do I really need to repeat it for a third time?

Re: Well done Rangi : Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:37 pm  

bren2k wrote:

Do I really need to repeat it for a third time?

No, you could stop trolling a thread congratulating a player with your petty nonsense though. HTH

Re: Well done Rangi : Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:28 pm  

bren2k wrote:

Do I really need to repeat it for a third time?

Repeat what, exactly?

Re: Well done Rangi : Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:33 pm  

Well done Rangi

Re: Well done Rangi : Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:34 pm  

Good for you Rangi

Re: Well done Rangi : Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:34 pm  

Great stuff Rangi