Re: kits : Mon Jun 06, 2011 11:43 am  

The RFL have changed the spreadsheet over night to suit there call so I don't see how any cas fans on here need to admit they were wrong.

Re: kits : Mon Jun 06, 2011 11:55 am  

TigersAllTheWay wrote:

The RFL have changed the spreadsheet over night to suit there call so I don't see how any cas fans on here need to admit they were wrong.

they have changed the spreadsheet to match the one received by clubs in mid May. the cas fans are not 'wrong'. Someone at Cas cocked up.

Re: kits : Mon Jun 06, 2011 11:58 am  

TigersAllTheWay wrote:

The RFL have changed the spreadsheet over night to suit there call so I don't see how any cas fans on here need to admit they were wrong.

If you look in the operation rules, rule B 1.27 states:

"Notwithstanding the provisions of B1.24, where the Colours of the visiting Club clash with that
of the home Club (and the Match Commissioner shall be the final arbiter of this), the visiting
Club must change into such alternative strip or parts of strip as the Match Commissioner may
direct. To ensure that this Rule can be complied with the visiting Club must bring two different
sets of strip to the Match."

HTH

Re: kits : Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:02 pm  

TigersAllTheWay wrote:

The RFL have changed the spreadsheet over night to suit there call so I don't see how any cas fans on here need to admit they were wrong.

Because several Cas fans on here and on VT have ripped in Huddersfield before knowing the full facts. Lynch mob mentality at it's worst. Just admit they got it wrong!

Re: kits : Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:07 pm  

Are people being serious about the RFL changing the spreadsheet??? I'm not doubting that they would, cos we've all seen the farce of a Challenge cup draw a few years ago etc.

But seriously have they changed it??

Re: kits : Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:16 pm  

the_grobs wrote:

Are people being serious about the RFL changing the spreadsheet??? I'm not doubting that they would, cos we've all seen the farce of a Challenge cup draw a few years ago etc.

But seriously have they changed it??

Yes. Several fans including myself posted the link to it last night as a reference. It stated hudds were to play in principle and cas in alternative. Looked at it today and they have changed it to hudds/alternative and cas/principle.

Re: kits : Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:35 pm  

TigersAllTheWay wrote:

Yes. Several fans including myself posted the link to it last night as a reference. It stated hudds were to play in principle and cas in alternative. Looked at it today and they have changed it to hudds/alternative and cas/principle.

I'll take your word for it sir!! But what a bunch of bent B'stds. The RFL are an absolute disgrace!

I'm off on one now!!! ......and they think that it's old stadiums that are keeping people away from games. Well they need to take a look at their ethics and ask why former followers have given up on the game. Grrrr!!!

I'm ok now rant over!!

Re: kits : Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:46 pm  

I can confirm that the RFL spreadsheet had Hudds in home and Cas in away strip last night after the game had finished. I can also confirm the the RFL have since changed this to Hudds away kit, Cas home kit today. This is what we are dealing with, the governing body running our sport. What a set of juankers!

Edit- And thanks to Firefox saving my browsing history I still have the old file just to prove I didn't read it wrong yesterday.

Re: kits : Mon Jun 06, 2011 1:36 pm  

marshman wrote:

I can confirm that the RFL spreadsheet had Hudds in home and Cas in away strip last night after the game had finished. I can also confirm the the RFL have since changed this to Hudds away kit, Cas home kit today. This is what we are dealing with, the governing body running our sport. What a set of juankers!

Edit- And thanks to Firefox saving my browsing history I still have the old file just to prove I didn't read it wrong yesterday.

And if you want to get at the truth rather than bask in conspiracy theory ask your club whether they received the kit directive sent out by the operations department in mid May. And there you will see that the information that has now been posted is correct: Giants alternate and Tigers principal.

Unless Cas have dodgy internet connections then the club got the directive and someone failed to read it and THEN your kit people failed to take 2 kits to games as required. The RFL cock up was a failure to update their own systems.

Re: kits : Mon Jun 06, 2011 1:51 pm  

Ceebeejames wrote:

And if you want to get at the truth rather than bask in conspiracy theory ask your club whether they received the kit directive sent out by the operations department in mid May. And there you will see that the information that has now been posted is correct: Giants alternate and Tigers principal.

Unless Cas have dodgy internet connections then the club got the directive and someone failed to read it and THEN your kit people failed to take 2 kits to games as required. The RFL cock up was a failure to update their own systems.

And if you owned your ground you wouldn't have been told to vacate by your football masters. Wouldn't have been a mix up then, but hey ho shiny stadiums and all. Doesn't matter if you own them maybe that should come up in the sl licenses own your ground get a bonus point.