Re: Sherwin Replacement 2011? : Sun Mar 21, 2010 2:08 pm  

Therailwayendisuponus. wrote:

If we try to sign Dobson, Wigan will only jump in and get him. Then we will get relegated. Ohno. That already happened!!

or

maybe you play poop as p1ss and you get relegated even though we cheated and did what any other team would have down, pint of bitter anyone, still, at least you managed to cheat your way back in to SL, but hey that's another story

Re: Sherwin Replacement 2011? : Sun Mar 21, 2010 2:36 pm  

Baked Bean Boogie wrote:

or

maybe you play poop as p1ss and you get relegated even though we cheated and did what any other team would have down, pint of bitter anyone, still, at least you managed to cheat your way back in to SL, but hey that's another story

Yeah, we propper cheated by winning the GF. Ever thought of typing in actual english?

Re: Sherwin Replacement 2011? : Sun Mar 21, 2010 3:19 pm  

Therailwayendisuponus. wrote:

Yeah, we propper cheated by winning the GF. Ever thought of typing in actual english?

i seem to recall there was a problem with breaking the NL1 cap limit or something like that but it was overlooked to stop your clib whining and bringing the game into disrepute, i do recall fans from other NL1 clubs complaining at the time

[tb]

Re: Sherwin Replacement 2011? : Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:30 pm  

You recall wrong then

Re: Sherwin Replacement 2011? : Sun Mar 21, 2010 5:46 pm  

tb wrote:

You recall wrong then

no i'm almost certain there was some crack and you were let of just like we were once before

[tb]

Re: Sherwin Replacement 2011? : Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:31 pm  

No.

We received a warning letter for a technical breach regarding the documentation. I don't honestly know whether that was forgetting to put a stamp on a letter or something slightly more serious. But it wasn't a breach of the cap and it wasn't cheating.

Cheating is spending £200,000 mote than the cap signing players you can't afford, trying to hide it by getting some players to agree to delay receiving their 2006 wages until 2007. And when you get caught cheating, you get hauled infront of a panel at Red Hall and, despit spending a fortune on lawyers to argue that the previous year's penalties should apply, you get docked points - not a letter telling you to improve your paperwork.

Wigan fans pointing to our 2007 brush with the cap commissioner to excuse their club's wholesale and deliberate cheating in 2006 is like the Guinness fraudsters or Robert Maxwell pointing out that someone was once a day late in paying their TV licence, so we shouldn't criticise their multimillion pound thefts.

Re: Sherwin Replacement 2011? : Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:11 pm  

Baked Bean Boogie wrote:

no i'm almost certain there was some crack and you were let of just like we were once before

Tell me do you practice talking bollox or does it come natural

Re: Sherwin Replacement 2011? : Sun Mar 21, 2010 8:40 pm  

tb wrote:

No.

We received a warning letter for a technical breach regarding the documentation. I don't honestly know whether that was forgetting to put a stamp on a letter or something slightly more serious. But it wasn't a breach of the cap and it wasn't cheating.

Cheating is spending £200,000 mote than the cap signing players you can't afford, trying to hide it by getting some players to agree to delay receiving their 2006 wages until 2007. And when you get caught cheating, you get hauled infront of a panel at Red Hall and, despit spending a fortune on lawyers to argue that the previous year's penalties should apply, you get docked points - not a letter telling you to improve your paperwork.

Wigan fans pointing to our 2007 brush with the cap commissioner to excuse their club's wholesale and deliberate cheating in 2006 is like the Guinness fraudsters or Robert Maxwell pointing out that someone was once a day late in paying their TV licence, so we shouldn't criticise their multimillion pound thefts.

funny how the RFL then gave us £245,000 (i think it was) back off the cap for the next season because secretly they knew we never cheated, it is done all the time down under, you lot are just bitter that you got relegated due ti the fact you where poop, and in fact if you had had the same funds available you would have done everything in your power to stay so jog on

[tb]

Re: Sherwin Replacement 2011? : Sun Mar 21, 2010 9:50 pm  

They didn't, idiot - money that was spent in 2006 was spent in 2006, obviously they didn't count it as spent in 2007: that was simply your attempted accounting sleight of hand trick, which didn't work