Re: Poskitt to Fev : Tue Feb 21, 2012 10:59 am  

inside man wrote:

But dicky wouldn't accept his cash.

Proof or just another obsessive pile of brown stuff ?

Re: Poskitt to Fev : Tue Feb 21, 2012 1:54 pm  

spener wrote:

Introduced himself at tonights AGM......said he needed to come to an ambitious club

inside man wrote:

But dicky wouldn't accept his cash.

I've actually heard both these as well, allegedly from the same source (albeit indirectly)...

Worrying times indeed, especially when you consider that SL and the NRL are making noises about increasing the number of International games. Could this result in a requirement to reduce the number of domestic games and therefore the number of teams in Super League?

Re: Poskitt to Fev : Tue Feb 21, 2012 1:58 pm  

Bonzo wrote:

I've actually heard both these as well, allegedly from the same source (albeit indirectly)...

Worrying times indeed, especially when you consider that SL and the NRL are making noises about increasing the number of International games. Could this result in a requirement to reduce the number of domestic games and therefore the number of teams in Super League?

Richard lewis passed comments a few months back that sl could be reduced to 12 clubs again

Re: Poskitt to Fev : Tue Feb 21, 2012 5:09 pm  

1. OMG get a grip you lot Poskit has got a better Job so moved his career on.

2. Probiz have and will always bob around to catch headlines with litttle sincerity involved so no surprise FN is off.

3. And yes maybe in 4 or 8 years there will only be 1 West Riding team in SL as this makes most sense ( Please don't shoot the messenger but reality is this )

4. If Cas or Wakey deliver on a stadium Fev have no chance of SL

Good luck to Craig he has taken us forward. Good luck to Faisal he has done us no harm.

Re: Poskitt to Fev : Tue Feb 21, 2012 5:14 pm  

forrard wrote:

Proof or just another obsessive pile of brown stuff ?

Do you have proof to say otherwise?

Re: Poskitt to Fev : Tue Feb 21, 2012 8:30 pm  

Fev have very little chance of getting into super league, their crowds are just not good enough. 1500 average. Their income is woefully short of expectations. They deliver on the field but off they are very poor.
Do they honestly think the RFL would have 3 teams in from Calder Area. Fev's ground is OK, but RFL are looking for Warrington, Salford , leigh, Saints standard, not a lego land bit of a stadium.

Re: Poskitt to Fev : Tue Feb 21, 2012 9:16 pm  

And the famous scabbycat, man of mystery, puts in an appearance!

Re: Poskitt to Fev : Tue Feb 21, 2012 9:21 pm  

j.c wrote:

Richard lewis passed comments a few months back that sl could be reduced to 12 clubs again

I can't see that. I'm sure that was just a warning shot across the bow to our two clubs. If one of us gets a stadium, it's the other plus one other. But who would that be? Unlikely that the sacred cow of the Broncos would go, or the Manchester anchor that is Salford. The Bulls won't, because it would affect revenue for their landlords, and would also mean that the door was shut forever on Halifax, leigh and the reformed Crusaders.

Re: Poskitt to Fev : Tue Feb 21, 2012 9:24 pm  

Latest rumour doing the rounds - Cas have sold their ground, build to start in 2013 at GH and Sainsbury to start at WR once planning is through. Tigers in talks with Cappers regarding a ground share at Postage Stamp Road for 2013.

Knock yourself out folks !

Re: Poskitt to Fev : Tue Feb 21, 2012 9:46 pm  

Tigerade wrote:

Latest rumour doing the rounds - Cas have sold their ground, build to start in 2013 at GH and Sainsbury to start at WR once planning is through. Tigers in talks with Cappers regarding a ground share at Postage Stamp Road for 2013.

Knock yourself out folks !

The stadium news seems to be gaining a lot of steam, but we will have to wait another 4-5 weeks for anything on that.

Why would Cas go to a worse ground than they already have for a year and potentially lose a franchise when they would be able to get the Keepmoat for a year, which is a far better stadium and not that far away.