Re: the sun : Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:20 pm  

deeHell wrote:

I'm told you where after a lot more than them 3. For the produce and sell policy to work you have to keep the conveyor belt going. Trust me it's been done at Wakey for years.

Maybe we are on the crest of a new dynesty?

cant see wakey been able to tempt many of the quality cas youngsters coming through,cas have shown i9n recent years that it pays to bring through local lads and that policy will continue,has for the conveyer belt well maybe if it would have been oiled a little better than players such has adam milner,nathen massey and oliver holmes would be playing for their home town teams but the facts are they were badly let down on scholorships they went elsewhere.

Re: the sun : Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:24 pm  

Anybody notice DeeHell vanished from the Cas board between the administration and franchise decision? wonder why that is...

Re: the sun : Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:32 pm  

This whole Glover Wakey thing is pointless, the salary cap and percentage of turnover governs the amount a club can spend on players, there is a sliding scale for exactly that reason. So, the wealth of any benefactor is mediated through those mechanisms. If Wakey can improve their position and compete better in the league - brilliant, well done them - matters little to most readers of this board.

The rest of the thread, interesting indeed, but thats about it; speculation about court cases etc is tricky - there are lots of court cases where people COULD be called to appear, but largely depending how people plan to plead and the legal implications they are rarely forced to do so.

Re: the sun : Fri Jul 29, 2011 6:09 pm  

mdean wrote:

This whole Glover Wakey thing is pointless, the salary cap and percentage of turnover governs the amount a club can spend on players, there is a sliding scale for exactly that reason. So, the wealth of any benefactor is mediated through those mechanisms. If Wakey can improve their position and compete better in the league - brilliant, well done them - matters little to most readers of this board.

The rest of the thread, interesting indeed, but thats about it; speculation about court cases etc is tricky - there are lots of court cases where people COULD be called to appear, but largely depending how people plan to plead and the legal implications they are rarely forced to do so.

Exactly...lets see if the citizens of Wakefield come through the gates in enough numbers to start their new "Dynasty".

Good luck to them though...even if it tough listening to a smug git attempting to derail yet another thread.

As for Rangi,well i guess the club will know the full details, but won't say anything in case it affects the ticket sales for the semi final.

Re: the sun : Fri Jul 29, 2011 7:13 pm  

Maybe Terry Matterson started the rumour and is just playing mind games with leeds
The club should make a statement to put this to bed as their silence is worrying me!

Re: the sun : Fri Jul 29, 2011 7:44 pm  

deeHell wrote:

I agree Parker is a bit of a dart thrower with his predictions but he did call it right when you couldn't afford to keep Shenton and Westerman. History repeating itself again

Except we offered both Shenton and Westerman new deals. Never mind, consistent as usual deeHell. Nice to see you back on the Cas forum, though.

Re: the sun : Sat Jul 30, 2011 6:41 am  

Can we please get back to the original post, its a lot important than talking about them reprobates from up the road and giving that dillusional character summat to feed on. So have we anymore info on Rangi, as he got a court case and will he be back if he does have one.

Re: the sun : Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:42 am  

Other than the Sun, I can't see this report any where else.

It does not mean it is untrue though. Wording is all important in the press, it does not say he may have to go back, it says he must. It's hardly liable if this is wrong though. Just incorrect reporting. What would be liablous would be if there was no case at all.

Who knows what will happen, the lawyers may adjuorn, it could be a Tuesday appearance in which case, flight over on Sunday night, sleep appear, back on tuesday night sleep wed and thurs, train friday, pre match saturday and sunday well he maybe back to normal.

The closer to Friday the court date, the more concerning this story will be.

Re: the sun : Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:53 am  

bewareshadows wrote:

Other than the Sun, I can't see this report any where else.

It does not mean it is untrue though. Wording is all important in the press, it does not say he may have to go back, it says he must. It's hardly liable if this is wrong though. Just incorrect reporting. What would be liablous would be if there was no case at all.

Who knows what will happen, the lawyers may adjuorn, it could be a Tuesday appearance in which case, flight over on Sunday night, sleep appear, back on tuesday night sleep wed and thurs, train friday, pre match saturday and sunday well he maybe back to normal.

The closer to Friday the court date, the more concerning this story will be.

That's what worries me, if there is a court case and it is at the end of the week. We need to have a fully fit Rangi Chase firing on all cylinders next Sunday.

Re: the sun : Sat Jul 30, 2011 12:08 pm  

There is no way to tell until it happens though, if it was an early week appearance I imagine the Tigers would want him out there and rested already.

I suppose in the end if he don't turn up what are they going to do? Start extradition proceedings?