Re: kits : Sun Jun 05, 2011 7:59 pm  

poppys mum wrote:

Bet the halifax sponsors were rubbing there hands.
As cas' sponsors should get some sort of compensation.

You share the same main sponsors for this year. Maybe it was FN's plan to claim he delivered a SL side in Halifax?

Re: kits : Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:01 pm  

Tricky2309 wrote:

You share the same main sponsors for this year. Maybe it was FN's plan to claim he delivered a SL side in Halifax?

The fax kit was last years.

Not a probiz logo to be seem.

Re: kits : Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:04 pm  

Kippaxer wrote:

The fax kit was last years.

Not a probiz logo to be seem.

I realised that, I was just making the point that it wasn't Halifax's sponsors getting exposure as Probiz are their sponsor for this year

Re: kits : Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:11 pm  

Is it true that the Fax fans were singing "Your not fit to wear the shirt" - I'd say that's a valid point !

Re: kits : Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:20 pm  

Could a Hudds official not have got his foot down to get some more gear? 10 mile round trip, isn't it?

Even if it meant they had to change over at the 1st available stoppage or even half time.

Re: kits : Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:24 pm  

Kippaxer wrote:

Could a Hudds official not have got his foot down to get some more gear? 10 mile round trip, isn't it?

Even if it meant they had to change over at the 1st available stoppage or even half time.

Couldn't they have done that when the players went out to warm up in white?

How long did it take Hilda to come down, get the key open and sort the kit out. An Hudds official could have been back towards Hudds by the time all that had happened.

Re: kits : Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:33 pm  

Fully wrote:

Couldn't they have done that when the players went out to warm up in white?

How long did it take Hilda to come down, get the key open and sort the kit out. An Hudds official could have been back towards Hudds by the time all that had happened.

True. I'm Guessing Hudds response will have been it's not our fault, we're staying as we are.

Somebody owes the old dear a big bag of Werthers Originals, be interesting to see if that's Huddersfield, Cas or the RFL.

Re: kits : Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:33 pm  

Clearly Hudds should have told Cas if they were planning to wear their white kit, so Cas could have come in their home strip.

Administrative cock up by Hudds that made the game a laughing stock on Sky.

Re: kits : Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:36 pm  

The official directive from the RFL states that Huddersfield are down to play in their Principal kit.
Huddersfield fans are saying they have been instructed by the RFL to play in white due to Sky coverage.
If true, then somewhere, someone has not told Cas this information or Cas have made a boo-boo.

All three parties have some responsibility. However, Huddersfield being the home team it seems stupid them playing in their alternative kit. If they can't play in Sky in their home kit like some of the excuses their fans are coming up with, they should be made to change their home kit so it IS suitable for Sky TV. Simple!

Re: kits : Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:39 pm  

Oh dear!. According to this http://bcafc.livewwware.co.uk/viewtopic ... &p=1010562 The match commissioner says it's OUR fault Chapman1994 wrote: The match commissioner has been interviewed by Sky & he said that it was down that Castleford would play in there home jersey's & Hudders would be playing in there alternate jersey's... Sadly Cas didn't pack the right kit & didn't bring a spare! Hence why they are in Halifax's! This one's going to run and run I think.

Oh dear!. According to this http://bcafc.livewwware.co.uk/viewtopic ... &p=1010562 The match commissioner says it's OUR fault Chapman1994 wrote: The match commissioner has been interviewed by Sky & he said that it was down that Castleford would play in there home jersey's & Hudders would be playing in there alternate jersey's... Sadly Cas didn't pack the right kit & didn't bring a spare! Hence why they are in Halifax's! This one's going to run and run I think.