Re: Wakey Express- Groundshare : Thu Jul 22, 2010 1:51 pm  

shepwildcat wrote:

just wonder what all your reactions would be if the independant inquiry came out in favour of newmarket.

just suppose for a minute

would you go watch cas there

would you support it

would you want cas to remain at wheldon road

would you go it alone with GH

and when you have answered all these questions, just try and understand our feelings and reactions, because we are entilted to an opinion also

shepwildcat wrote:

just wonder what all your reactions would be if the independant inquiry came out in favour of newmarket.

just suppose for a minute

would you go watch cas there........NO

would you support it......NO

would you want cas to remain at wheldon road......YES

would you go it alone with GH.........IF IT WAS POSSIBLE THEN YES

Re: Wakey Express- Groundshare : Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:08 pm  

Fully wrote:

That's the trouble - Box isn't the one making a decision. The Feasibility study is entirely independent and will be given back to the Council.

Call me cynical,but wahtever the study says,they dont have to accept it.

Also(i could be wrong here),any decisions made are not by full council,but by the cabinet,which comprises of 6/7 councillors,headed by Peter Box.

Re: Wakey Express- Groundshare : Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:26 pm  

TURFEDOUT wrote:

Call me cynical,but wahtever the study says,they dont have to accept it.

Also(i could be wrong here),any decisions made are not by full council,but by the cabinet,which comprises of 6/7 councillors,headed by Peter Box.

No, the clubs don't have to accept it but I would expect it is highly recommended.

As for the Cabinet, yes, but Peter Box is not one person. But we're lucky in the fact we have Denise Jeffery and Yvette Cooper on board.

Re: Wakey Express- Groundshare : Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:42 pm  

Fully wrote:

No, the clubs don't have to accept it but I would expect it is highly recommended.

As for the Cabinet, yes, but Peter Box is not one person. But we're lucky in the fact we have Denise Jeffery and Yvette Cooper on board.

The council dont have to accept it either.

Re: Wakey Express- Groundshare : Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:06 pm  

Gaslight wrote:

I think the little quote from SWAG in the Cas & Pont today just shows how bitter, small minded and closed minded the Wakey fans are.

Nowt like lumping everyone together

You must be guilty of homophobic chanting then by your own reckoning.

Re: Wakey Express- Groundshare : Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:37 pm  

BIGAL1 wrote:

Nowt like lumping everyone together

You must be guilty of homophobic chanting then by your own reckoning.

What would we know, we're just from a small town in Wakefield - despite the fact it now seems too far away for Wildcats fans to go to watch their team regularly!

Re: Wakey Express- Groundshare : Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:40 pm  

Arv wrote:

What would we know, we're just from a small town in Wakefield - despite the fact it now seems too far away for Wildcats fans to go to watch their team regularly!

very true.

Well i suspect each individual fan will make his/her own mind up on that, unless we apply the other theory

Re: Wakey Express- Groundshare : Thu Jul 22, 2010 6:04 pm  

BIGAL1 wrote:

:D very true.

Well i suspect each individual fan will make his/her own mind up on that, unless we apply the other theory

The other theory being that an entire rugby club and its supporters should take the blame and punishment for the moronic behaviour of a handful of people, I take it.

It's amazing what happens to individuals when they get treated as groups: they can begin to start seeing everyone else the same way.

Re: Wakey Express- Groundshare : Thu Jul 22, 2010 6:11 pm  

Arv wrote:

The other theory being that an entire rugby club and is supporters should take the blame and punishment for the moronic behaviour of a handful of people, I take it.

It's amazing what happens to individuals when they get treated as groups: they can begin to start seeing everyone else the same way.

You know exactly what i mean

Re: Wakey Express- Groundshare : Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:20 am  

BaldRick wrote:

Because the future of my club is not in doubt right now .
I was not trolling , was just adding my view . If it was my team then I would want some guarantee that they were going to survive . I think binks' idea could work .

If theres a merger my club ceases to exist, its the biggest threat to the clubs future.

If there is no team called castleford tigers then i will support lock lane.