Re: Disgraceful incident : Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:26 pm  

quinny wrote:

you really are dumb arn't you ?

Good grammar costs nothing.

Re: Disgraceful incident : Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:29 pm  

007 wrote:

Do you think if it had really happened it wouldn't have been all over the Wakefield forums,why wait until now?

Well certainly it is a minority of fans who use these boards, so it may not be mentioned, but yes, I would have thought it would have been heard before now.

Is it because it is not featured on these boards that you are so certain it didn't happen??

I don't know if it did and neither do you.

And don't turn it into a Wakey/Cas relegation topic - that's just another head-burying tactic.

Cas have a problem and it needs dealing with.

Re: Disgraceful incident : Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:32 pm  

They Call Me Trinity wrote:

well i can say 100% that it did happen, so can my father and im guessing the guy they set upon wont forget it in a hurry either, who knows maybe the other 200 or so onlookers still had their black and gold blinkers on

So you and your father saw it,did you go to help?Did you report it to a steward or the police?With two of you it's then a corroborated account,did the guy who was assaulted report it? if not why not,and you're saying that straight after the game there were no other Wakefield fans who witnessed it ? just you and your father.

Re: Disgraceful incident : Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:35 pm  

007 wrote:

Fact,no incident reported,that is the truth,and swearing suits you,no really.

You have no evidence at all as to whether it was happened/reported at all.

You postulate that, because you aren't aware of it, it didn't happen!

I don't know if it happened - that's a fact.

It's also a fact that, just because you or I don't know about it, it didn't occur.

It's not a difficult concept.

Re: Disgraceful incident : Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:37 pm  

007 wrote:

So you and your father saw it,did you go to help?Did you report it to a steward or the police?With two of you it's then a corroborated account,did the guy who was assaulted report it? if not why not,and you're saying that straight after the game there were no other Wakefield fans who witnessed it ? just you and your father.

You are just a "denier"!

Re: Disgraceful incident : Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:38 pm  

dboy wrote:

You are just a "denyer"!

Congratulations, you've made up a word Firefox doesn't even have a suggestion for what it's supposed to be, that takes a special kind of stupid.

Secondly, this is why the Cas board needs more mods, it's been over run by Wakey trolls, you do know you have your own board right?

Not to mention your constant berating of Cas is now becoming borderline libellous, pack it in

dboy wrote:

You are just a "denier"!

There we go, had the dictionary out have we?

Re: Disgraceful incident : Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:39 pm  

dboy wrote:

Well certainly it is a minority of fans who use these boards, so it may not be mentioned, but yes, I would have thought it would have been heard before now.

Is it because it is not featured on these boards that you are so certain it didn't happen??

I don't know if it did and neither do you.

And don't turn it into a Wakey/Cas relegation topic - that's just another head-burying tactic.

Cas have a problem and it needs dealing with.

Why would I turn it into an anti Wakefield thread,you are the first to mention it.

Re: Disgraceful incident : Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:40 pm  

dboy wrote:

You are just a "denier"!

Changed it I see.

Re: Disgraceful incident : Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:41 pm  

dboy wrote:

You are just a "denier"!

Is that a grade of tights?

Re: Disgraceful incident : Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:44 pm  

Gaslight wrote:

Congratulations, you've made up a word Firefox doesn't even have a suggestion for what it's supposed to be, that takes a special kind of stupid.

Secondly, this is why the Cas board needs more mods, it's been over run by Wakey trolls, you do know you have your own board right?

Not to mention your constant berating of Cas is now becoming borderline libellous, pack it in

I'm flattered that you took the time to look it up. I toyed with both denyer, as in someone who denies things, and denier, but that is easily confused with denier, as in tights. It is however, the correct spelling.

I would have hoped that Firefox\would have a suggestion, e.g. as in holocaust denier.

And nothing I have put is baiting, berating or trolling. And it is certainly not libelous (with 1 L if we're playing the spelling game).