Re: Stadium : Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:18 am  

Fumper27 wrote:

Exactly. I would be more worried about the situation Bradford are in the Castleford. At least we have assets that we actually own!

I own a set of Titleist golf clubs I cannot sell, am I asking too much for them?

Re: Stadium : Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:29 am  

Fully wrote:

But the promises are being fulfilled. The RFL cannot force these things in the current economic climate and they have to show a little understanding.

You also keep believing that the stadium is the only relevant factor; it isn't. Cas will be a B licence once the stadium starts getting built.

What promise has been fulfilled ?? we have no stadium and no new news ??
If RW was a player giving 110% he would still not get a new contract because try as he may he is not delivering the Goods, End Of

Re: Stadium : Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:33 am  

binks wrote:

What promise has been fulfilled ?? we have no stadium and no new news ??
If RW was a player giving 110% he would still not get a new contract because try as he may he is not delivering the Goods, End Of

We have full planning permission for a new stadium. We can build the new stadium tomorrow if we wanted. There IS going to be a stadium.

Just because we don't have news, doesn't mean the RFL don't. As I've said, they are fully aware of the situation and are fully appreciative of that.

Re: Stadium : Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:35 am  

Your funny man!

Re: Stadium : Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:37 am  

Fully wrote:

We have full planning permission for a new stadium. We can build the new stadium tomorrow if we wanted. There IS going to be a stadium.

Just because we don't have news, doesn't mean the RFL don't. As I've said, they are fully aware of the situation and are fully appreciative of that.

The obvious question is if you can, why isn't it there???
Your simplification of the situation is in stark contrast to what everyone can see and defies what blatantly is hampering you thus far, it makes you stand out as a beacon of hope in bleak isolation I'm afraid.

Re: Stadium : Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:57 am  

kinleycat wrote:

The obvious question is if you can, why isn't it there???
Your simplification of the situation is in stark contrast to what everyone can see and defies what blatantly is hampering you thus far, it makes you stand out as a beacon of hope in bleak isolation I'm afraid.

The simple fact: we don't have the money. And it's generally more expensive to build it in stages.

Our primary asset needs to be sold before it can be built. If we had £15m it would be built tomorrow.

That is the reality of the situation.

Re: Stadium : Tue Jun 12, 2012 11:05 am  

Then you cannot build a stadium tomorrow then.
That is the actual reality of the situation.

Re: Stadium : Tue Jun 12, 2012 11:15 am  

kinleycat wrote:

Then you cannot build a stadium tomorrow then.
That is the actual reality of the situation.

You misread the context of what I meant in a sense: I was merely pointing out that we CAN build the stadium - there are no planning hurdles from preventing us from doing so. If you read the first line of my comment, you would have understood that.

As it is, your comments could be conceived as a very well hidden attempt at trolling.

Re: Stadium : Tue Jun 12, 2012 11:19 am  

Fully wrote:

You misread the context of what I meant in a sense: I was merely pointing out that we CAN build the stadium - there are no planning hurdles from preventing us from doing so. If you read the first line of my comment, you would have understood that.

As it is, your comments could be conceived as a very well hidden attempt at trolling.

I think i read what you posted, which was misleading.
Anyhow its all cleared up now!

Re: Stadium : Tue Jun 12, 2012 11:21 am  

Not misleading in any way. We have full planning permission, therefore, we can legally start building the stadium tomorrow. The only issue is funding, which is currently tied up in asset.