: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:51 pm  

vikingste wrote:

Matt Calland talking about throwing your toys out the pram!!!!!

the best team won simple as.....and cullen had just told you all

No we weren't. And if you honestly think that you need your head checking.

: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:55 pm  

The Dors wrote:

No we weren't. And if you honestly think that you need your head checking.

The best team did win, your pack lost the battle up front and Thackeray tore you to shreds.


Thus were going to Blackpool, Calland should have grew a pair and admitted Fax were second best.

: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:00 pm  

-VIKINGMAN- wrote:

The best team did win, your pack lost the battle up front and Thackeray tore you to shreds.


Thus were going to Blackpool, Calland should have grew a pair and admitted Fax were second best.

You lot were more honest when you hated Cullen.

: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:01 pm  

The Dors wrote:

You lot were more honest when you hated Cullen.

: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:30 pm  

rickster wrote:

just got back from work so missed boots n all.Just a couple of final thoughts about sunday's game.Widnes were better for first 50 mins, in part due to their selection.By playing Morrison at loose forward they had a bigger and more streetwise pack -Fax never got into any rythym and , due to intense pressure and tackling , had to force to many passes and make too many tackles.For 20 mins we then started playing a wider game - I thought Govin made a difference when he joined the fray and we were in the ascendency.Then came the Black moment - after that game over.
I also think by having Roberts and Matt James out , we were definitely weaker in the forwards. Widnes in the end deserved it - but I also feel they played their best , we certainly didn't.

At last...someone with a brain!!!!

: Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:37 pm  

rickster wrote:

just got back from work so missed boots n all.Just a couple of final thoughts about sunday's game.Widnes were better for first 50 mins, in part due to their selection.By playing Morrison at loose forward they had a bigger and more streetwise pack -Fax never got into any rythym and , due to intense pressure and tackling , had to force to many passes and make too many tackles.For 20 mins we then started playing a wider game - I thought Govin made a difference when he joined the fray and we were in the ascendency.Then came the Black moment - after that game over.
I also think by having Roberts and Matt James out , we were definitely weaker in the forwards. Widnes in the end deserved it - but I also feel they played their best , we certainly didn't.

I disagree i think we can get better.We have only been training all together for 3 weeks.

: Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:40 pm  

rickster wrote:

just got back from work so missed boots n all.Just a couple of final thoughts about sunday's game.Widnes were better for first 50 mins, in part due to their selection.By playing Morrison at loose forward they had a bigger and more streetwise pack -Fax never got into any rythym and , due to intense pressure and tackling , had to force to many passes and make too many tackles.For 20 mins we then started playing a wider game - I thought Govin made a difference when he joined the fray and we were in the ascendency.Then came the Black moment - after that game over.
I also think by having Roberts and Matt James out , we were definitely weaker in the forwards. Widnes in the end deserved it - but I also feel they played their best , we certainly didn't.

Good post, we are missing Matt james big time, without him we have an older pack especially with Big Frank, Wrenchy and Dave Larder in.
We need to look at signing another younger prop and now not next year..

: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:06 pm  

SL Cullen once again showing his knowledge about the game at this level. Cas only team to get through the heart of our defence?

Widnes fans need to get over it all ready. They got a lucky win against a team that results sugest are a country mile better than Widnes. They should celebrate like mad because with Cullen at the helm things like this dont last long.

: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:40 pm  

Fax4Life wrote:

Good post, we are missing Matt james big time, without him we have an older pack especially with Big Frank, Wrenchy and Dave Larder in.
We need to look at signing another younger prop and now not next year..

I think your right we need somebody to replace Larder / Wrench for next year.

: Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:18 am  

nows not the time to consider who needs replacing for next year.everyone at the club has a job to finish this year and need our full support.