FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!

   WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Miliband - "too little done to integrate UK society"
::Off-topic discussion.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman28357
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 17 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
2nd May 24 20:2424th Oct 19 15:32LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
MACS0647-JD
Signature
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-20715253

The Labour leader will call for more proficiency in the English language as part of his One Nation ideal.

He will also admit his party's last government made mistakes in tackling the "realities of segregation" in struggling communities.

In part, that means rejecting the idea that people can "live side by side in their own communities, respecting each other but living separate lives, protected from hatreds but never building a common bond - never learning to appreciate one another", he explains.


I am curious to know how he thinks this can work. In Bradford, there are very sharply defined areas where Muslim populations live. Increasingly, the women wear all-black, including the veil, which cuts them off entirely from the lives of pretty much anyone except their own family and other women in the same situation. As I understand it, there are even more strict households, where the women are not allowed out unchaperoned.

I would ask Mr Miliband how he would square the sort of "integration" he seems to think he can achieve, with the rules and beliefs of people who, as a matter of religion, are forever ad completely forbidden from doing any such thing. I'm no expert so I'd point him here:
http://www.al-islam.org/a-code-of-ethics-for-muslim-men-and-women/6.htm
and just to single out one or two stumbling blocks to integration:

181 – Rule: It is not allowed to talk to someone about anything that is related to sexual or intimate issues (except one’s spouse). AGKLMS

Note and warning: Sometimes, it can be seen that in the hearts of men, the devil has become so firm that many of their social gatherings are doubtful, and it can be seen that a man has more interest in mingling with non-Mahram women than with his own Maharim. For example, there is a situation in which he can ask something from a man, but instead, he asks a non-Mahram woman; sometimes his conversation with non-Mahram women is prolonged so as to be able to talk with them more; going to places of amusement and on vacations with non-Mahram women is more attracting to him; if there is a place where there are non-Mahram women, he desires to be there more than other places; and when guests come over, he tries to talk and socialize more with the non-Mahram women than the men. He likes to stay in the presence of non-Mahram women more so than anywhere else. In summary, he likes any action that non-Mahram women are participating in more than any other work.

Men - especially our dear youth must stay away from these types of things because this kind of socializing and speaking (with members of the opposite sex) are usually associated with the intention of lust and obtaining (sexual) pleasure and can lead to being haram, according to Islam.


183 – Rule: It is Makruh for women to speak to men if it is not necessary.

("Makruh" = abominable, offensive]
191 – Question: Is it allowed to read romance novels in which sexual issues are being discussed? Also, is it allowed to print such books?

Answer: It is not allowed.


197 – Rule: Even though looking at the face and hands of a Muslim woman in hijab, and looking at that amount of the body of a non-Muslim woman which is normally kept open is not a problem, however touching them is still not allowed. ABGKLMS

Therefore: Men and women who are non-Mahram are not allowed to shake hands with each other, nor can they have any other kind of bodily contact.

Note: In the below mentioned circumstances, one must be more cautious than in other instances about the bodily contact (not taking place) with a non-Mahram:

1. Taking or giving even a small object from the hands of a non-Mahram (for example exact change).

2. Taking or giving keys, or any other small things.

3. Sitting beside a non-Mahram in taxis (or buses), or when guests come over to one’s house.

4. Non-Mahram men and women walking in a common, crowded area such as corridors, small alleys, doors, gates, etc.

5. Men going to gatherings in which lots of women are present, or any place where there are lots of non-Mahram women present.

6. Women going (or passing by) a gathering or busy place where there are lots of non-Mahram men present.

7. At the time of buying and selling things in stores.


218 – Rule: It is not allowed to go to a gathering in which one knows that something haram will take place. For example, to accept a dinner invitation in which a person knows that by going there he will be forced to look at non-Mahram women without hijab


In the understated examples of programs and other mixed gatherings there is a probability of sin, and more so than other instances, one must be extra cautious:

To have mixed dinner parties, especially if the people attending are youths; non-Mahrams eating together at the same table; going with non-Mahrams to amusement parks or other entertainment places such as gardens, parks, mountains, travelling – especially if a non-Mahram man and woman are in a car alone; to joke around with a non-Mahrams; two non-Mahram working together in one shop, etc…


220 – Question: Respectfully, I would like to inform you that we have relatives, who in addition to not reciting their Salat, also associate with Christians. Furthermore, their girls and women do not observe the proper hijab and their hair also shows, and however much we advise them, it does not have any effect. If we want to close our eyes in our own house, then it is not possible, and if we look at them, then it is a sin. In this instance, what should we do? What is the ruling on our interactions with them?

Answer: If it will have an effect, then enjoin them to good and forbid them from evil, and other than this, you have no other responsibility, and in the event that you have relations and socializing with them, you must be careful that you don’t fall into sin by looking at non-Mahrams. It is not necessary to cut off relations with them since there is a possibility that maybe, by keeping ties with them, it may have an affect on them. May Allah (SWT) guide them and acquaint them with the Laws of Islam


Now, while personally I just wish all religion was abolished, I respect the choices of others to live their lives their own way, and I quote the above in a completely neutral way, and don't comment about it. What I do say is, if this is the belief and rule system of whole communities, then very clearly, any meaningful integration is impossible. There are just too many stumbling blocks. It seems that everything is predicated upon the assumption that anything and everything either is sexual, incites sexual thoughts or behaviour or risks doing so, and this must be strenuously guarded against at every possible moment.

Would not adherents of such a code find his comments offensive, and say "Why should we act against our beliefs to so called "integrate" with those who do not share our beliefs?"

What price integration a la Miliband?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-20715253

The Labour leader will call for more proficiency in the English language as part of his One Nation ideal.

He will also admit his party's last government made mistakes in tackling the "realities of segregation" in struggling communities.

In part, that means rejecting the idea that people can "live side by side in their own communities, respecting each other but living separate lives, protected from hatreds but never building a common bond - never learning to appreciate one another", he explains.


I am curious to know how he thinks this can work. In Bradford, there are very sharply defined areas where Muslim populations live. Increasingly, the women wear all-black, including the veil, which cuts them off entirely from the lives of pretty much anyone except their own family and other women in the same situation. As I understand it, there are even more strict households, where the women are not allowed out unchaperoned.

I would ask Mr Miliband how he would square the sort of "integration" he seems to think he can achieve, with the rules and beliefs of people who, as a matter of religion, are forever ad completely forbidden from doing any such thing. I'm no expert so I'd point him here:
http://www.al-islam.org/a-code-of-ethics-for-muslim-men-and-women/6.htm
and just to single out one or two stumbling blocks to integration:

181 – Rule: It is not allowed to talk to someone about anything that is related to sexual or intimate issues (except one’s spouse). AGKLMS

Note and warning: Sometimes, it can be seen that in the hearts of men, the devil has become so firm that many of their social gatherings are doubtful, and it can be seen that a man has more interest in mingling with non-Mahram women than with his own Maharim. For example, there is a situation in which he can ask something from a man, but instead, he asks a non-Mahram woman; sometimes his conversation with non-Mahram women is prolonged so as to be able to talk with them more; going to places of amusement and on vacations with non-Mahram women is more attracting to him; if there is a place where there are non-Mahram women, he desires to be there more than other places; and when guests come over, he tries to talk and socialize more with the non-Mahram women than the men. He likes to stay in the presence of non-Mahram women more so than anywhere else. In summary, he likes any action that non-Mahram women are participating in more than any other work.

Men - especially our dear youth must stay away from these types of things because this kind of socializing and speaking (with members of the opposite sex) are usually associated with the intention of lust and obtaining (sexual) pleasure and can lead to being haram, according to Islam.


183 – Rule: It is Makruh for women to speak to men if it is not necessary.

("Makruh" = abominable, offensive]
191 – Question: Is it allowed to read romance novels in which sexual issues are being discussed? Also, is it allowed to print such books?

Answer: It is not allowed.


197 – Rule: Even though looking at the face and hands of a Muslim woman in hijab, and looking at that amount of the body of a non-Muslim woman which is normally kept open is not a problem, however touching them is still not allowed. ABGKLMS

Therefore: Men and women who are non-Mahram are not allowed to shake hands with each other, nor can they have any other kind of bodily contact.

Note: In the below mentioned circumstances, one must be more cautious than in other instances about the bodily contact (not taking place) with a non-Mahram:

1. Taking or giving even a small object from the hands of a non-Mahram (for example exact change).

2. Taking or giving keys, or any other small things.

3. Sitting beside a non-Mahram in taxis (or buses), or when guests come over to one’s house.

4. Non-Mahram men and women walking in a common, crowded area such as corridors, small alleys, doors, gates, etc.

5. Men going to gatherings in which lots of women are present, or any place where there are lots of non-Mahram women present.

6. Women going (or passing by) a gathering or busy place where there are lots of non-Mahram men present.

7. At the time of buying and selling things in stores.


218 – Rule: It is not allowed to go to a gathering in which one knows that something haram will take place. For example, to accept a dinner invitation in which a person knows that by going there he will be forced to look at non-Mahram women without hijab


In the understated examples of programs and other mixed gatherings there is a probability of sin, and more so than other instances, one must be extra cautious:

To have mixed dinner parties, especially if the people attending are youths; non-Mahrams eating together at the same table; going with non-Mahrams to amusement parks or other entertainment places such as gardens, parks, mountains, travelling – especially if a non-Mahram man and woman are in a car alone; to joke around with a non-Mahrams; two non-Mahram working together in one shop, etc…


220 – Question: Respectfully, I would like to inform you that we have relatives, who in addition to not reciting their Salat, also associate with Christians. Furthermore, their girls and women do not observe the proper hijab and their hair also shows, and however much we advise them, it does not have any effect. If we want to close our eyes in our own house, then it is not possible, and if we look at them, then it is a sin. In this instance, what should we do? What is the ruling on our interactions with them?

Answer: If it will have an effect, then enjoin them to good and forbid them from evil, and other than this, you have no other responsibility, and in the event that you have relations and socializing with them, you must be careful that you don’t fall into sin by looking at non-Mahrams. It is not necessary to cut off relations with them since there is a possibility that maybe, by keeping ties with them, it may have an affect on them. May Allah (SWT) guide them and acquaint them with the Laws of Islam


Now, while personally I just wish all religion was abolished, I respect the choices of others to live their lives their own way, and I quote the above in a completely neutral way, and don't comment about it. What I do say is, if this is the belief and rule system of whole communities, then very clearly, any meaningful integration is impossible. There are just too many stumbling blocks. It seems that everything is predicated upon the assumption that anything and everything either is sexual, incites sexual thoughts or behaviour or risks doing so, and this must be strenuously guarded against at every possible moment.

Would not adherents of such a code find his comments offensive, and say "Why should we act against our beliefs to so called "integrate" with those who do not share our beliefs?"

What price integration a la Miliband?
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Board Member28186No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 03 200322 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
17th Aug 16 11:3717th Aug 16 11:37LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
A world of my own ...
Signature
"As you travel through life don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things" - George Carlin

//twitter.com/AndyGilder

//fromthewesternterrace.blogspot.co.uk

This week: Four keys to a Rhinos win in the WCC

Sometimes, someone needs to remind Mr Ed that all he has to do is sit back, let the current lot continue botching the economy, education, NHS etc and not say anything that might be controversial.

It's almost like he's finding ways to get out of becoming Prime Minister.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman28357
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 17 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
2nd May 24 20:2424th Oct 19 15:32LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
MACS0647-JD
Signature
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total

Andy Gilder wrote:
Sometimes, someone needs to remind Mr Ed that all he has to do is sit back, let the current lot continue botching the economy, education, NHS etc and not say anything that might be controversial.

It's almost like he's finding ways to get out of becoming Prime Minister.


Would you blame him? :D
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Club Coach18610No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 18 200619 years303rd
OnlineLast PostLast Page
2nd Aug 24 05:5923rd Jul 24 12:36LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Somewhere in Bonny Donny (Twinned with Krakatoa in 1883).
Signature
War does not determine who is right - only who is left.

Thank God I'm an atheist.

Admittance that a government got things wrong (very badly) but now in oposition sees the light. Please spare us the meaningless enlightenment shoite.
It's another way of saying sorry you know, only with a positive spin.
They presided over a p/iss up in a brewery and stifled debate as racism.
Get that Mail away from yourself Stand-Offish!

But yes something needs doing by someone with a clue.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
In The Arms of 13 Angels14522No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 26 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
30th Jan 14 14:039th Jan 14 11:22LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Online
Signature
Freedom without Socialism is privilege and injustice.
Socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality.

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:
... What I do say is, if this is the belief and rule system of whole communities, then very clearly, any meaningful integration is impossible. There are just too many stumbling blocks. It seems that everything is predicated upon the assumption that anything and everything either is sexual, incites sexual thoughts or behaviour or risks doing so, and this must be strenuously guarded against at every possible moment.

Would not adherents of such a code find his comments offensive, and say "Why should we act against our beliefs to so called "integrate" with those who do not share our beliefs?"

What price integration a la Miliband?


No price and I'd say that the stumbing blocks are actually worse than that, they are almost guaranteed to lead to conflicts rooted in mutual misunderstanding.

Just as an aside, and without meaning to be offensive at all ...how do people identify burkah-ed individuals one from another, if they are roughly the same size, because all you see are eyes and an apparently shapeless garment?
I'm guessing that the idea is that you don't ... because that could obviously only be for the purposes of lust.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
All Time Great47951No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
May 10 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
6th Aug 17 19:0327th Jul 17 17:56LINK
Milestone Posts
40000
50000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Die Metropole
Signature
"You are working for Satan." Kirkstaller

"Dare to know!" Immanuel Kant

"Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive" Elbert Hubbard

"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." Oscar Wilde

The Voluptuous Manifesto – thoughts on all sorts of stuff.

Interesting comments above.

But it's hardly a 'new' situation to have, in effect, ghettoes in the UK.

There have been ones in areas such as Stamford Hill for donkey's years, but nobody has ever seen that as an issue. These are areas that use specific religious laws in family courts. Children are dressed differently – and educated differently. It's difficult to see how that is good for integration.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
In The Arms of 13 Angels14522No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 26 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
30th Jan 14 14:039th Jan 14 11:22LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Online
Signature
Freedom without Socialism is privilege and injustice.
Socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality.

One evening in the 1990's, I was in The Northumberland Arms on Goodge Street, London (it used to be a Tetley's pub) and whilst being served at the bar, a young bloke perched on a bar stool picked-up on my accent and asked me (in a Yorkshire accent) where I was from.
He was from Leeds and so was I.
Whilst I was waiting for La Senora to turn up, he and I fell into conversation, comfortable in each other's company and sharing humour and chat ... he explaining to his (Londoner) colleagues about this conversation (with an apparent stranger) that we were both Yorkshire lads and, following that, some friendly North v South banter ensued.

His skin colour and facial characteristics would have suggested India or Pakistan and, whilst I'd obviously noticed, it was only later that it occurred to me that it hadn't cropped-up, we were both Yorkshire lads and that made him the same as me, which was not something I would have said about the rest of the Londoner clientele.

Funny how it works isn't it? Someone integrates and what happens? We become allies in inter-regional banter, which is itself another form of non-integration.
WIZEB 
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach12749
JoinedServiceReputation
Nov 23 200915 years39th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
7th Dec 24 07:4121st Nov 24 16:06LINK
Milestone Posts
10000
15000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
The Hamptons of East Yorkshire

El Barbudo wrote:
One evening in the 1990's, I was in The Northumberland Arms on Goodge Street, London (it used to be a Tetley's pub) and whilst being served at the bar, a young bloke perched on a bar stool picked-up on my accent and asked me (in a Yorkshire accent) where I was from.
He was from Leeds and so was I.
Whilst I was waiting for La Senora to turn up, he and I fell into conversation, comfortable in each other's company and sharing humour and chat ... he explaining to his (Londoner) colleagues about this conversation (with an apparent stranger) that we were both Yorkshire lads and, following that, some friendly North v South banter ensued.



His skin colour and facial characteristics would have suggested India or Pakistan and, whilst I'd obviously noticed, it was only later that it occurred to me that it hadn't cropped-up, we were both Yorkshire lads and that made him the same as me, which was not something I would have said about the rest of the Londoner clientele.

Funny how it works isn't it? Someone integrates and what happens? We become allies in inter-regional banter, which is itself another form of non-integration.


Yes but was the female whom you were waiting upon also from t'north of t'Watford Gap?
John_D 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman31779
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 21 200223 years285th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
23rd Jul 24 07:1515th Jul 24 07:10LINK
Milestone Posts
30000
40000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
The commentary box
Signature
johnpdobson.com


Twitter
Moderator

There's nothing that says non-integration/ghettoisation better than an exclusive gated community.


Or Harrogate.
Cronus 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Club Coach7152
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 30 200520 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
4th Dec 20 18:2622nd Jun 20 21:45LINK
Milestone Posts
5000
10000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
one day closer to death

Whilst hosting a work Xmas party at the Hard Rock by Green Park a couple of years ago I got chatting to an extremely drunk girl from "Sarf Landan". Found myself in quite an awkward situation when she starting going on that "it was facking brilliant that I was a white English lad, cos they're all facking forriners where she comes from and she was fackin' sick of 'em."

Her bosses and colleagues, all of Pakistani origin, were stood next to us casting wary glances my way.
Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 176 guests

REPLY

Subject: 
Message:
   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...

Return to The Sin Bin


RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
14m
Film game
Boss Hog
6065
50m
Sports Personality of the Year
Wires71
13
57m
2025 Recruitment
Pyrah123
261
Recent
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
chapylad
2655
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
53s
Pre Season - 2025
The games af
227
1m
Transfer Talk V5
chapylad
567
1m
2025 Kit
Bully_Boxer
28
1m
Sports Personality of the Year
Wires71
13
1m
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
chapylad
2655
1m
Shirt reveal coming soon
KevW60349
71
2m
Jerome Luai
The Whiffy K
22
2m
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
The Dentist
4086
3m
Christmas Party Night B Vue tonight cancelled
Dunkirk Spir
3
3m
2025 Recruitment
Pyrah123
261
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Christmas Party Night B Vue tonight cancelled
Dunkirk Spir
3
TODAY
Doug Laughton
batleyrhino
10
TODAY
Sports Personality of the Year
Wires71
13
TODAY
Forget-me-not Childrens hospice
H.G.S.A
1
TODAY
All time academy produced Super league era side
MjM
3
TODAY
Wigan warriors 2022 away shirt
WWste
4
TODAY
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
TonyM19
4
TODAY
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
Zig
8
TODAY
Rule Changes
Rugby Raider
5
TODAY
Player Contracts
Trojan Horse
6
TODAY
Fans Forum 12 Dec 11th
Dunkirk Spir
3
TODAY
Laurie Daley returns as NSW origin coach
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
2025 Challenge Cup
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Challenge Cup
BigTime
6
TODAY
Friendlies
Deadcowboys1
3
TODAY
Sam Luckley likely to miss the beginning of new season
Huddersfield
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
RLFANS Match Centre
Matches on TV
Thu 13th Feb
SL
20:00
Wigan-Leigh
Fri 14th Feb
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Castleford
SL
20:00
Catalans-Hull FC
Sat 15th Feb
SL
15:00
Leeds - Wakefield
SL
17:30
St.Helens-Salford
Sun 16th Feb
SL
15:00
Huddersfield-Warrington
Thu 20th Feb
SL
20:00
Wakefield - Hull KR
Fri 21st Feb
SL
20:00
Warrington-Catalans
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Wigan
Sat 22nd Feb
SL
15:00
Salford-Leeds
SL
20:00
Castleford-St.Helens
Sun 23rd Feb
SL
14:30
Leigh-Huddersfield
Fri 28th Feb
SL
20:00
Huddersfield-Hull FC
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Salford
SL
20:00
Leigh-Catalans
Sat 1st Mar
SL
14:30
Wakefield - St.Helens
SL
21:30
Wigan-Warrington
Sun 2nd Mar
SL
15:00
Leeds-Castleford
Thu 6th Mar
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Leigh
Fri 7th Mar
SL
20:00
Castleford-Salford
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wigan 29 768 338 430 48
Hull KR 29 731 344 387 44
Warrington 29 769 351 418 42
Leigh 29 580 442 138 33
Salford 28 556 561 -5 32
St.Helens 28 618 411 207 30
 
Catalans 27 475 427 48 30
Leeds 27 530 488 42 28
Huddersfield 27 468 658 -190 20
Castleford 27 425 735 -310 15
Hull FC 27 328 894 -566 6
LondonB 27 317 916 -599 6
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wakefield 27 1032 275 757 52
Toulouse 26 765 388 377 37
Bradford 28 723 420 303 36
York 29 695 501 194 32
Widnes 27 561 502 59 29
Featherstone 27 634 525 109 28
 
Sheffield 26 626 526 100 28
Doncaster 26 498 619 -121 25
Halifax 26 509 650 -141 22
Batley 26 422 591 -169 22
Swinton 28 484 676 -192 20
Barrow 25 442 720 -278 19
Whitehaven 25 437 826 -389 18
Dewsbury 27 348 879 -531 4
Hunslet 1 6 10 -4 0
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
14m
Film game
Boss Hog
6065
50m
Sports Personality of the Year
Wires71
13
57m
2025 Recruitment
Pyrah123
261
Recent
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
chapylad
2655
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
53s
Pre Season - 2025
The games af
227
1m
Transfer Talk V5
chapylad
567
1m
2025 Kit
Bully_Boxer
28
1m
Sports Personality of the Year
Wires71
13
1m
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
chapylad
2655
1m
Shirt reveal coming soon
KevW60349
71
2m
Jerome Luai
The Whiffy K
22
2m
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
The Dentist
4086
3m
Christmas Party Night B Vue tonight cancelled
Dunkirk Spir
3
3m
2025 Recruitment
Pyrah123
261
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Christmas Party Night B Vue tonight cancelled
Dunkirk Spir
3
TODAY
Doug Laughton
batleyrhino
10
TODAY
Sports Personality of the Year
Wires71
13
TODAY
Forget-me-not Childrens hospice
H.G.S.A
1
TODAY
All time academy produced Super league era side
MjM
3
TODAY
Wigan warriors 2022 away shirt
WWste
4
TODAY
Captains Challenge for Televised Games in 2025
TonyM19
4
TODAY
Captains Challenge to be introduced in 2025
Zig
8
TODAY
Rule Changes
Rugby Raider
5
TODAY
Player Contracts
Trojan Horse
6
TODAY
Fans Forum 12 Dec 11th
Dunkirk Spir
3
TODAY
Laurie Daley returns as NSW origin coach
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
2025 Challenge Cup
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Challenge Cup
BigTime
6
TODAY
Friendlies
Deadcowboys1
3
TODAY
Sam Luckley likely to miss the beginning of new season
Huddersfield
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS


Visit the RLFANS.COM SHOP
for more merchandise!