There is a valid point here. If any country loses all of it's "best talent" how will it prosper or, should it wait to be "helped" by it's wealthier friends.
Nobody mentioned "all".
It's down to freedom and an individual being able to be as much of a success as they can be in their chosen industry, by moving to where the best jobs are.
It's a stupid comment because you can't fully fulfil and exploit a persons talent if there isn't the job or resources for them to do so. Prosperity is driven more by government policy, economics, entrepreneurs etc. A highly-skilled person could utterly waste their talent & their earning potential, all because someone simplistically thinks that a country keeping their best talent automatically makes that country better. They'd just sit there & rot.
It's down to freedom and an individual being able to be as much of a success as they can be in their chosen industry, by moving to where the best jobs are.
It's a stupid comment because you can't fully fulfil and exploit a persons talent if there isn't the job or resources for them to do so. Prosperity is driven more by government policy, economics, entrepreneurs etc. A highly-skilled person could utterly waste their talent & their earning potential, all because someone simplistically thinks that a country keeping their best talent automatically makes that country better. They'd just sit there & rot.[
I think that you are wrong to say "they'd sit there and rot". If, for instance, the UK takes large numbers of doctors/surgeons from another country to fill the void within the NHS, it'snot as though there are 100's of fully trained medics sat at home, waiting fo the phone to ring so they may become employed. These people may wish to "better themselves" and happily move to another country to improve their personal situation but, it can leave a void in their "home" country. Although it would be wrong to prevent people "getting on", it is also wrong to bleed poorer nations of their resources.
Mind you in the modern dog eat dog world, looking after number one does seem to be the order of the day and to hell with the rest.
I'm not sure that Trump knew what he meant by saying that or, that it was America's Independence Day. They certainly got a result against all odds but, they haven't gained any independence and they haven't made an exit from anywhere.
I wonder which of the worlds "crazy's" will be the first to test him ?
Unlike Farage, this guy cant just disappear into the background and then blame others for the situation that he is now in.
It's down to freedom and an individual being able to be as much of a success as they can be in their chosen industry, by moving to where the best jobs are.
It's a stupid comment because you can't fully fulfil and exploit a persons talent if there isn't the job or resources for them to do so. Prosperity is driven more by government policy, economics, entrepreneurs etc. A highly-skilled person could utterly waste their talent & their earning potential, all because someone simplistically thinks that a country keeping their best talent automatically makes that country better. They'd just sit there & rot.
" someone simplistically thinking that a country keeping their best talent automatically makes that country better " , well yes actually it probably does
A country with a rapidly ageing population and losing its earners , it's Doctors , it's Dentists , it's nurses , it's civil engineers , is looking at a bleak future
But so what , who cares about them , as long as we can look after our own
What a stupid comment to make. Reminds me of the Stewart Lee routine about immigration and a comment Paul Nuttall made (he's a right wing nutter from UKIP), which you've quoted pretty much word for word unfortunately.
So because 2 people say the same thing , that makes it wrong ?
DGM wrote:
What a stupid comment to make. Reminds me of the Stewart Lee routine about immigration and a comment Paul Nuttall made (he's a right wing nutter from UKIP), which you've quoted pretty much word for word unfortunately.