DaveO wrote:
You see the trouble you have is you don't think before you post. Either that or as I have said before your understanding of grammar is poor. You have been trying to make the same point ever since you decided this post of mine said what you wanted it to say:
In February 2013 DaveO wrote:
7. Back to the economy, its just not going to pick up that much if at all between now and the election so they won't have much success to point to.
Still oh so true. As I said " its just not going to pick up that much if at all between now and the election" and that is a true statement. It has not picked up much at all and Osborne and you are running out of time.
You can deride Blanchflower all you want ignoring the data he presents and deliberately misinterpret posts on here as you did mine but all that does is show you up as incapable of arguing a point without doing just that.
The economy "won't pick up that much if at all between now and the next election".
The economy
has picked up - 1.9% since your statement and you are becoming more and more wrong with every quarterly growth figure published. You do realise strong growth is predicted next year don't you?
Continuing to post that you don't think you were wrong is going to become more and more embarrassing for you and just shows you up for the doom mongering poster you are. To think
you accuse
me of having my head in the sand.
Why don't you just admit, like Blanchflower, that you were wrong?