Re: Baroness Warsi : Sun May 27, 2012 12:08 pm  

Maybe she did pay rent but the recipient didn't declare it and is trying to cover himself?

Mind you she must need to see an optician as her oversights appear to include not declaring rent on a flat she allegedly let out in Wembley and allegedly claim expenses when she wasn't forking anything out. Are politicians not subject to the laws they promulgate?

Re: London v Hull at Gillingham : Sun May 27, 2012 1:05 pm  

Dally wrote:

Are politicians not subject to the laws they promulgate?

Did you have three shredded wheat for breakfast or have you found one of them missing textbooks?

Re: London v Hull at Gillingham : Sun May 27, 2012 4:58 pm  

WIZEB wrote:

Did you have three shredded wheat for breakfast or have you found one of them missing textbooks?

Are we not allowed to use English now? Chavspeak and Doublespeak only is it?

Re: London v Hull at Gillingham : Sun May 27, 2012 5:18 pm  

Dally wrote:

Are we not allowed to use English now? Chavspeak and Doublespeak only is it?

No English is fine but I have to ask what does 'ger' mean?

Re: London v Hull at Gillingham : Sun May 27, 2012 8:26 pm  

Anakin Skywalker wrote:

No English is fine but I have to ask what does 'ger' mean?

I see you edited your post.
So hypocracy it is then

Re: London v Hull at Gillingham : Sun May 27, 2012 9:01 pm  

Anakin Skywalker wrote:

I see you edited your post.
So hypocracy it is then

Deary me.

Re: London v Hull at Gillingham : Sun May 27, 2012 9:39 pm  

Dally wrote:

Deary me.

I'm glad you agree but you will insist on coming on the Sin Bin and putting your foot in it.

Re: Baroness Warsi : Sun May 27, 2012 9:43 pm  

Baroness Warsi is another of the 'big mistakes' made by the Cameron regime in the Tory party.

A few years ago she was rated as a potential huge asset for rebranding the Conservative party, they saw her as a confident and assertive woman from an ethnic minority who would be good in front of the cameras, similar to how Labour have high hopes for Chuka Ummuna as a black Obama-esque figure.

They promoted Warsi at every opportunity, pushing her onto Newsnight, Question Time, encouraging her to be outspoken but she is one of those politicians that puts her foot in her mouth with regularity. I expect there are a fair few within Conservative HQ will be glad to have her silenced. Ummuna on the other hand has kept a fairly low profile so far, probably waiting for Labour to gain a bit more popularity before he really strikes forward.

Re: Baroness Warsi : Mon May 28, 2012 1:08 pm  

Warsi's elevation the the Lords was effectively (IMO) a corrupt act in that she had no experience / qualification to justify it. It was simply tokenism to try to show the same old same old Tories were modern. Just like the tree and the "green" branding. She personifies the danger of positive discrimination.

[tb]

Re: Baroness Warsi : Mon May 28, 2012 2:46 pm  

She personifies the dangers of the Tory party's belief that "we are naturally born to rule, the rules don't apply to us, and if voters disagree (as they did with Warsi in Dewsbury), feck 'em"