Re: Put your money where your mouth is : Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:09 pm  

Dally wrote:

As explained previously, it's by far and away the best laid out, easy to access online 'paper. That's why its the most popular online.

nothing to do with the fact that you have to subscribe to most others, but the Wail peddles it's garbage for free?

Re: Put your money where your mouth is : Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:18 pm  

Standee wrote:

nothing to do with the fact that you have to subscribe to most others, but the Wail peddles it's garbage for free?

Or that that garbage includes screeds of near-erotic pictures and titillating stories (last week, it carried pictures of two teenage females – can't remember who – and was commenting about how they looked older than their 16 years etc).

Then, of course, there are the likes of Liz Jones and Samantha Brick ...

Please excuse me while I try to scrub those names from my brain.

Re: Put your money where your mouth is : Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:28 pm  

Mintball wrote: Or that that garbage includes screeds of near-erotic pictures and titillating stories (last week, it carried pictures of two teenage females – can't remember who – and was commenting about how they looked older than their 16 years etc). It had some great pictures of "Coco" Austin on the beach earlier in the week. Not bad for 54, even with some enhancements. For those interested: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... ikini.html Mind you it wasn't the bra she was spilling from, hence the censors photo! Now gents, tell me the Mail online is all bad.

Mintball wrote: Or that that garbage includes screeds of near-erotic pictures and titillating stories (last week, it carried pictures of two teenage females – can't remember who – and was commenting about how they looked older than their 16 years etc). It had some great pictures of "Coco" Austin on the beach earlier in the week. Not bad for 54, even with some enhancements. For those interested: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... ikini.html Mind you it wasn't the bra she was spilling from, hence the censors photo! Now gents, tell me the Mail online is all bad.

Re: Put your money where your mouth is : Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:30 pm  

Dally wrote: It had some great pictures of "Coco" Austin on the beach earlier in the week. Not bad for 54, even with some enhancements. For those interested: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... ikini.html Mind you it wasn't the bra she was spilling from, hence the censors photo! Now gents, tell me the Mail online is all bad. I've seen more attractive drag artists!

Dally wrote: It had some great pictures of "Coco" Austin on the beach earlier in the week. Not bad for 54, even with some enhancements. For those interested: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... ikini.html Mind you it wasn't the bra she was spilling from, hence the censors photo! Now gents, tell me the Mail online is all bad. I've seen more attractive drag artists!

Re: Put your money where your mouth is : Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:44 pm  

Standee wrote:

I've seen more attractive drag artists!

She's got a face, has she?

Re: Put your money where your mouth is : Fri Jun 08, 2012 4:27 pm  

Dally wrote: It had some great pictures of "Coco" Austin on the beach earlier in the week. Not bad for 54, even with some enhancements. For those interested: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... ikini.html Mind you it wasn't the bra she was spilling from, hence the censors photo! Now gents, tell me the Mail online is all bad. Thats awful. I don't mean the female (who the hell is she anyway) or her appalling choice of swimwear or obvious lack of decorum and just bloody good taste, but the fact that a newspaper has bought the non-story in the first place - "Woman takes dogs for a walk" isn't the most obvious photo-shoot for most newspapers, "Almost naked woman takes dogs for a walk" is the clincher. Would "Almost naked man takes dogs for a walk" be purchased by The Mail as a good photo story - and lets not forget, The Mail BOUGHT these photos to publicise, for what I don't know because I'm still looking for the story outside of "Almost naked woman takes dogs for a walk". No, we all know what happened here (and having a cousin who pimps stories to the national press I'm well aware of how its works), the pair of them decided that they needed a few grand this month and so rang their local news desk or photographer with the news that they were taking their dogs for a walk, "Nah, we'll pass on that one" said the news desk, "But my hugely buxom wife will wear a bikini thats designed for a twelve year old" came the reply, "We're on our way" they shouted back down the phone - a ridiculous situation made all the more obvious by the fact that it doesn't even lok like a warm day - the husband (who the hell he ?) is wearing a sweat shirt. Nice earner, not far removed from prostitution though.

Dally wrote: It had some great pictures of "Coco" Austin on the beach earlier in the week. Not bad for 54, even with some enhancements. For those interested: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/ar ... ikini.html Mind you it wasn't the bra she was spilling from, hence the censors photo! Now gents, tell me the Mail online is all bad. Thats awful. I don't mean the female (who the hell is she anyway) or her appalling choice of swimwear or obvious lack of decorum and just bloody good taste, but the fact that a newspaper has bought the non-story in the first place - "Woman takes dogs for a walk" isn't the most obvious photo-shoot for most newspapers, "Almost naked woman takes dogs for a walk" is the clincher. Would "Almost naked man takes dogs for a walk" be purchased by The Mail as a good photo story - and lets not forget, The Mail BOUGHT these photos to publicise, for what I don't know because I'm still looking for the story outside of "Almost naked woman takes dogs for a walk". No, we all know what happened here (and having a cousin who pimps stories to the national press I'm well aware of how its works), the pair of them decided that they needed a few grand this month and so rang their local news desk or photographer with the news that they were taking their dogs for a walk, "Nah, we'll pass on that one" said the news desk, "But my hugely buxom wife will wear a bikini thats designed for a twelve year old" came the reply, "We're on our way" they shouted back down the phone - a ridiculous situation made all the more obvious by the fact that it doesn't even lok like a warm day - the husband (who the hell he ?) is wearing a sweat shirt. Nice earner, not far removed from prostitution though.

Re: Put your money where your mouth is : Fri Jun 08, 2012 4:33 pm  

McLaren_Field wrote:

Thats awful.

I don't mean the female (who the hell is she anyway) or her appalling choice of swimwear or obvious lack of decorum and just bloody good taste, but the fact that a newspaper has bought the non-story in the first place - "Woman takes dogs for a walk" isn't the most obvious photo-shoot for most newspapers, "Almost naked woman takes dogs for a walk" is the clincher.

Would "Almost naked man takes dogs for a walk" be purchased by The Mail as a good photo story - and lets not forget, The Mail BOUGHT these photos to publicise, for what I don't know because I'm still looking for the story outside of "Almost naked woman takes dogs for a walk".

No, we all know what happened here (and having a cousin who pimps stories to the national press I'm well aware of how its works), the pair of them decided that they needed a few grand this month and so rang their local news desk or photographer with the news that they were taking their dogs for a walk, "Nah, we'll pass on that one" said the news desk, "But my hugely buxom wife will wear a bikini thats designed for a twelve year old" came the reply, "We're on our way" they shouted back down the phone - a ridiculous situation made all the more obvious by the fact that it doesn't even lok like a warm day - the husband (who the hell he ?) is wearing a sweat shirt.

Nice earner, not far removed from prostitution though.

'twas in The Sun too.

Re: Put your money where your mouth is : Fri Jun 08, 2012 4:40 pm  

Dally wrote:

'twas in The Sun too.

I've fallen off my chair in surprise, the agency done well, can't wait for next weeks coverage of her taking the kitchen waste out to the dustbin with the dogs and dressed with just an ostrich feather, as you do.

Re: Put your money where your mouth is : Fri Jun 08, 2012 6:44 pm  

I only go on the Daily Mail website to look at the upskirt pics they have of female celebrities getting out of taxis at premieres and nightclubs, I wouldn't bother with its politics or economics commentary.

Re: Put your money where your mouth is : Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:20 pm  

Not a nice set of pics and I've never heard of her anyway.