Re: the "return" of Tory sleaze : Wed Jul 06, 2022 5:33 pm  

chissitt wrote:

Watched it all unfold on Sky news this dinner time squire, don't know which I laughed at most to be honest, stuttering Boris with his excuses or the opposition trying very very unsuccessfully to pin him down, don't know which is the funniest watching PMQ or reading your silly posts, no need for a reply I'm done go get yer mum to read you a bedtime story

Awwww, diddums.
You'll be alright sunshine, it's all a game.
We've all been on the wrong horse at times.
Sleep tight pal.

Re: the "return" of Tory sleaze : Wed Jul 06, 2022 6:03 pm  

chissitt wrote:

Watched it all unfold on Sky news this dinner time squire, don't know which I laughed at most to be honest, stuttering Boris with his excuses or the opposition trying very very unsuccessfully to pin him down, don't know which is the funniest watching PMQ or reading your silly posts, no need for a reply I'm done go get yer mum to read you a bedtime story

You're not taking it well then

Re: the "return" of Tory sleaze : Wed Jul 06, 2022 7:09 pm  

The general view amongst all watchers except Chissit was that Starmer made de Pffell and his bunch of nodding dogs extremely uncomfortable. I wonder if that after today’s PMQ many have gone to de Pffell to ask him to resign.
He won’t of course, I don’t know why they don’t just change the locks. I wonder if he will take the wallpaper and furniture with him when he finally accepts it is over.

Re: the "return" of Tory sleaze : Wed Jul 06, 2022 7:10 pm  

The Ghost of '99 wrote:

You're not taking it well then

The insults , no I'm not no need for em, if your on about Boris I thought it was quite funny how he stuttered his way through the proceedings trying to defend himself, I also thought it funny how try as they may his enemies of all parties couldn't pin him down, thought it made for good dinnertime entertainment, will he wriggle his way out of trouble, who knows who cares, I certainly don't, don't give a toss one way or tuther but I wouldn't bet against him with your money, doesn't affect me mucka it won't change my life they all deserve each other.

Re: the "return" of Tory sleaze : Wed Jul 06, 2022 7:30 pm  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

The general view amongst all watchers except Chissitt was that Starmer made Boris and his bunch of nodding dogs extremely uncomfortable. I wonder if that after today’s PMQ many have gone to Boris to ask him to resign.
He won’t of course, I don’t know why they don’t just change the locks. I wonder if he will take the wallpaper and furniture with him when he finally accepts it is over.

I see your back to stalking me again, is the rest of your post to me or for anybody sufficiently interested in reading it, you obviously liked that bit where Sir Keir mentioned the nodding dogs phrase as you are now para phrasing him with it can we expect this on a regular basis like when you call Boris de prifferol it doesn't make you as cool as you think, and just to be clear other than forever stating the obvious I doubt Sir Keir would be intelligent enough to make Boris more uncomfortable than Boris has made himself, I would have thought Sir Keir would be more uncomfortable having to sit next to the lady on his left when she kept crossing her legs.
Are you back from your hols in Albania yet, I hope whoever you left in charge of your garden gnomes looked after them okay, you've had your two penneth now give it a rest please.

Re: the "return" of Tory sleaze : Wed Jul 06, 2022 9:20 pm  

chissitt wrote:

I see your back to stalking me again, is the rest of your post to me or for anybody sufficiently interested in reading it, you obviously liked that bit where Sir Keir mentioned the nodding dogs phrase as you are now para phrasing him with it can we expect this on a regular basis like when you call Boris de prifferol it doesn't make you as cool as you think, and just to be clear other than forever stating the obvious I doubt Sir Keir would be intelligent enough to make Boris more uncomfortable than Boris has made himself, I would have thought Sir Keir would be more uncomfortable having to sit next to the lady on his left when she kept crossing her legs.
Are you back from your hols in Albania yet, I hope whoever you left in charge of your garden gnomes looked after them okay, you've had your two penneth now give it a rest please.

You really are beginning to once more lose the plot, I was merely correcting your assumption that Starmer failed to hold de Pfeffel and his rag tag band (one of my own) to account at PMQ when in fact all those who know more about this than you said he made his points very well. This left de Pfeffel floundering with his usual stock answers, Brexit, Vaccinations etc. The question is why in your undoubtable knowledge think this was not the case. If you had at least made a cogent argument for your opinion it would look at least thought through rather than the usual rubbish you spout which demands correction.
I think we all know who is the most knowledgeable when one reached the top of his field and the other bumbled along doing the least possible except producing children with various women.
I know calling him de Pfeffel doesn’t make me cool but calling him de prifferol does make you look stupid.
If I ever go to Albania I will let you know

[Wanderer]

Re: the "return" of Tory sleaze : Thu Jul 07, 2022 7:34 am  

Debate is good but please drop the name calling and insults.

Re: the "return" of Tory sleaze : Thu Jul 07, 2022 8:22 am  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

You really are beginning to once more lose the plot, I was merely correcting your assumption that Starmer failed to hold Boris and his rag tag band (one of my own) to account at PMQ when in fact all those who know more about this than you said he made his points very well. This left Boris floundering with his usual stock answers, Brexit, Vaccinations etc. The question is why in your undoubtable knowledge think this was not the case. If you had at least made a cogent argument for your opinion it would look at least thought through rather than the usual rubbish you spout which demands correction.
I think we all know who is the most knowledgeable when one reached the top of his field and the other bumbled along doing the least possible except producing children with various women.
I know calling him de Pfeffel doesn’t make me cool but calling him de prifferol does make you look stupid.
If I ever go to Albania I will let you know

Don't remember in my reply to the holy ghost assuming anything other than Boris was his usual self, wriggling out of accusations against him so 0 out of 10 for your obvious attempt at causing mischief, I don't have an argument for or against Boris or his opposition as I've already stated they all deserve each other and I personally don't give a flying one, all I am guilty of is replying to an insult from one of your mates on here if that helps, not sure why the personal insult about producing children with various women, are you that desperate why don't you just let the man make a fool of himself without you parading old insults.
Your right on one thing though calling him de Pfeffel doesn't make you look cool, it makes you look a right tit, and as for me calling him de prifferol it's called taking the pish, I here you've now taken up line dancing, each to there own I suppose, could that actually be some sort of anger management course or has your missus talked you into it, anyway hopefully I've done here unless you've got something new and constructive to offer, please no more insults there so tiresome and so unbecoming for an elder poster and so respected like yourself.

Re: the "return" of Tory sleaze : Thu Jul 07, 2022 8:34 am  

aaaaaand the lying oaf is gone!

Can someone check on Chissitt please. Make sure hes ok

Re: the "return" of Tory sleaze : Thu Jul 07, 2022 1:23 pm  

TheWarringtonWolve69 wrote:

aaaaaand the lying oaf is gone!

Can someone check on Chissitt please. Make sure hes ok

I'm good thanks squire, must say also it's another shabby attempt by your good self at winding me up, stick to clocks it's much simpler for you, oh and by the way, you've missed an apostrophe from the word he's if that helps, you couldn't make it up having to educate somebody from the grammar police