Re: Saints challenge cup : Mon Jun 07, 2021 2:55 pm  

Riderofthepalehorse wrote:

I think it all originated from iron man Wilkins comments on the beeb, Josh replied to Wilkin,

some nasty individual was laughing at Josh injury.
Josh has closed his Twitter account.

He does right, some real low lifes out there. As for Wilkin, the most impartial pundit ever. Ex Rovers, Ex Saints mmmmmmm!!!!

Re: Saints challenge cup : Mon Jun 07, 2021 3:44 pm  

Hessle Roader wrote:

He does right, some real low lifes out there. As for Wilkin, the most impartial pundit ever. Ex Rovers, Ex Saints mmmmmmm!!!!

That’s what I said . Ex Rovers player who played at Saints. Gonna love FC.

Re: Saints challenge cup : Mon Jun 07, 2021 4:04 pm  

Armavinit wrote:

No - it depends on what you want to see, and how you make disparaging claims.

Did you actually see the incident? What did you see??

The disciplinary panel saw it the way it was.....

Case Number: ON/503/21
Name: Josh Griffin
Details of allegation: Dangerous Contact in the 23rd minute
Decision: Charge
Details of Charge /
Reason for NFA:
Law 15.1 (i)
Dangerous Contact - Defender uses any part of their body
forcefully to twist, bend or otherwise apply pressure to the
limb or limbs of an opposing player in a way that involves an
unacceptable risk of injury to that player.
Grade C
Penalty Notice: 2 Match Penalty Notice

No disparaging claims there then!!

Re: Saints challenge cup : Mon Jun 07, 2021 4:41 pm  

lp2012 wrote:

Did you actually see the incident? What did you see??

The disciplinary panel saw it the way it was.....

Case Number: ON/503/21
Name: Josh Griffin
Details of allegation: Dangerous Contact in the 23rd minute
Decision: Charge
Details of Charge /
Reason for NFA:
Law 15.1 (i)
Dangerous Contact - Defender uses any part of their body
forcefully to twist, bend or otherwise apply pressure to the
limb or limbs of an opposing player in a way that involves an
unacceptable risk of injury to that player.
Grade C
Penalty Notice: 2 Match Penalty Notice
I attended the game and was sat near the commentators, so didn’t see anything untoward, you encouraged my ire by coming on here to say he definitely did it, you should have suggested it took place as another poster did. Did you watch it on tv because as I said, I couldn’t see anything untoward and no one around me suggested anything had happened. Haven’t watched the televised game so have no idea if the commentary team mentioned it.

No disparaging claims there then!!

It is a disparaging claim, your supposed to be innocent until proven guilty. I’m surprised Savellio didn’t get a ban for hitting a Saints player with the lower 2/3rds of his arm. The amount of head high tackles Saints got away with was ridiculous.

Re: Saints challenge cup : Mon Jun 07, 2021 4:44 pm  

[quote="lp2012"]Did you actually see the incident? What did you see??
I was sat in the East stand near the commentary position and saw nothing untoward, as did anyone I was sat with, haven’t watched the TV game, did the commentators pick up on it?

Re: Saints challenge cup : Mon Jun 07, 2021 5:00 pm  

Armavinit wrote:

It is a disparaging claim, your supposed to be innocent until proven guilty. I’m surprised Savellio didn’t get a ban for hitting a Saints player with the lower 2/3rds of his arm. The amount of head high tackles Saints got away with was ridiculous.

I’ve just read that the disciplinary ruled that there was no shoulder charge in the Savellio incident, as I said earlier it depends what you want to see as opposed to what actually happens.

Re: Saints challenge cup : Mon Jun 07, 2021 6:22 pm  

Armavinit wrote:

It is a disparaging claim, your supposed to be innocent until proven guilty. I’m surprised Savellio didn’t get a ban for hitting a Saints player with the lower 2/3rds of his arm. The amount of head high tackles Saints got away with was ridiculous.

My last post on this subject..........

I was watching on TV and so I accept that I had a better view of the incident than you would have at the match - you didn't see it - the commentators didn't mention it - the officials didn't see anything wrong with it.. but clearly that doesn't mean that it didn't happen - it did! I originally posted my belief that Griffin was "guilty" to use your terminology - the Disciplinary committee looked at the incident and also decided that he was "guilty". I don't know what's disparaging about that! It will clearly be non-productive to point out the irony of you making the totally disparaging comment about the supposed high tackles that Saints got away with - it obviously depends on what you want to see (to quote!!)

Re: Saints challenge cup : Mon Jun 07, 2021 6:24 pm  

Armavinit wrote:

I’ve just read that the disciplinary ruled that there was no shoulder charge in the Savellio incident, as I said earlier it depends what you want to see as opposed to what actually happens.

I never mentioned Savelio - get a grip!

Re: Saints challenge cup : Mon Jun 07, 2021 7:13 pm  

lp2012 wrote:

I never mentioned Savelio - get a grip!

Thought the post before last was “ the last post on this subject” you get a grip.
Another super fan who doesn’t go to games, put your socks back on your feet, keyboard warrior.