Re: SC : Thu Dec 31, 2020 6:44 pm  

Problem with the lottery is down to numbers in the office managing things!

Re: SC : Thu Dec 31, 2020 8:48 pm  

NB,really ?
Four months on from winning and still no prize.

Re: SC : Thu Dec 31, 2020 11:24 pm  

Just saying how it is, not making excuses.
Its what i was told when i asked where my winnings were, believe there are 2 folk total in the office. Am assuming you have e mailed and asked the question.

Re: SC : Fri Jan 01, 2021 1:34 pm  

We have been contacted by the club who disagree with the information contained within a post on this thread and request that the author contact the club directly to discuss. They suggested that the post was potentially libellous and asked us to remove it so we are not involved in any legal action. The post was removed to protect the site.

Thread also locked.

Site ADMIN

Re: SC : Fri Jan 01, 2021 1:58 pm  

Can't say i'm surprised in what you say.

Re: SC : Fri Jan 01, 2021 2:12 pm  

Bostwick wrote:

NB,really ?
Four months on from winning and still no prize.

Hi there.

I find it very strange that you have been waiting four months for a lottery win payment, I have checked the spreadsheet and nobody is waiting any longer than since November, which I do accept is a decent length of time to wait, however we have been really busy with the SL bid and various other things at the club.

Please email me, it can be sorted really quickly and really easily. If you have been waiting four months then please just send me an email now and I can verify it within minutes of getting the email.

Re: SC : Fri Jan 01, 2021 2:55 pm  

wantawin wrote:

We have been contacted by the club who disagree with the information contained within a post on this thread and request that the author contact the club directly to discuss. They suggested that the post was potentially libellous and asked us to remove it so we are not involved in any legal action. The post was removed to protect the site.

Thread also locked.

Site ADMIN

That is a damming post. I'm surprised in one sense but not in another. I'm not sure the scope of the club was ever laid out nor any meaningful measurables set (certainly not publicly published); therefore it would always be open to 'personality'. That would therefore be doomed to failure.

Even today i just cant think what the SC could realistically offer. Away match coaches, social events,(we've had both of them pre SC) after that i'm lost. Its such a small supporter base.

Re: SC : Fri Jan 01, 2021 2:57 pm  

I have to say that I think the whole Supporters Club thing has been handled very badly. The fact the the club did not have the courtesy to communicate its intentions to the LBSA, prior to the announcement of its formation, was at least, rather poor.
I decided from the onset not to get involved and am glad having read what you have said Wantawin, that I have done so.
I too have followed the club for many years and the SC joins a long line of things that the club have done to upset the fans.The dwindling number of fans brings proof of this.
What is more the officers of the club are very thin skinned, as you have found out. Criticism is taken badly. Can you imagine if we started a fanzine, how well that would go down.
Certainly someone needs to get a grip of this side of the club, before more loyal fans join the exodus.
I might add that very recently I won a prize in the LBSA 100 club. The prize money was made available to me the very same day.

Re: SC : Fri Jan 01, 2021 3:13 pm  

wire-quin wrote:

That is a damming post. I'm surprised in one sense but not in another. I'm not sure the scope of the club was ever laid out nor any meaningful measurables set (certainly not publicly published); therefore it would always be open to 'personality'. That would therefore be doomed to failure.

Even today i just cant think what the SC could realistically offer. Away match coaches, social events,(we've had both of them pre SC) after that i'm lost. Its such a small supporter base.

Within a week of the first committee meeting a consitution was written and agreed, which to my knowledge has never been published. As I left the committee back at the beginning of November, I am not sure if the constitution is being followed as you require 5 committee members to form a quorum, I do not think there are 5 committee members. I will say the minutes of the first committee meeting did state the aim of the supporters club and the aim was then published in the first (and only?) news letter.