[PopTart]

Re: IMG scores : Thu Oct 31, 2024 11:25 pm  

Prince Buster wrote:

I can't speak for the others, but in respect to us you are wrong. We as a club have always wanted to improve and always tried to do so. Our various owners going back to the start of SL have wanted improvement. However only Matt has had the resources to actually do so.

It's where they tried to improve that made the difference.
It's not just Matt. Carter and Minards were working on the IMG targets before anyone else and that's why Matt has a good platform.
So I'm not really sure where you think I'm wrong. Especially as it us my opinion on IMG. You are entitled to yours.

I do realise my 'not bothered' comment was probably too strong.

Re: IMG scores : Fri Nov 01, 2024 7:32 am  

PopTart wrote:

It has to be the same criteria for me.
Otherwise you end up with weaker teams in SL.

P&R can come in when the teams are string enough to make the leap.

Sorry should of made it clearer.. I was talking about clubs that make promotion from league 1 to championship.
Those clubs are way off being able to fill the criteria for SL.
If they continue to improve after promotion then make them fulfill the IMG criteria

[PopTart]

Re: IMG scores : Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:19 pm  

Belle Vue wrote:

Sorry should of made it clearer.. I was talking about clubs that make promotion from league 1 to championship.
Those clubs are way off being able to fill the criteria for SL.
If they continue to improve after promotion then make them fulfill the IMG criteria

Ah OK.
I think they way they are looking to help that is a money reward for winning the playff/grand final.....and so helping them finance those changes.

Re: IMG scores : Mon Nov 04, 2024 8:43 pm  

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/sport/footbal ... b15ec&ei=9

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/sport/footbal ... b15ec&ei=9