Re: Langley article : Tue Jan 06, 2015 4:25 pm  

Angelic Cynic wrote:

*Ahem* Matthew 13:57

Indeed.

Re: Langley article : Fri Jan 09, 2015 11:12 am  

It was a pity it didn't work out for Langers at Rovers because he is a very good player. He seemed somewhat overshadowed at Rovers by strong personalities and then had that season ending injury. I was sad to see him go and feel he would fit in nicely in the new cohort - being around Travis was difficult to say the least.

You have a cracker in Langers, good luck for the forthcoming season, it will be a struggle to make the 4 but you never know, London in particular will find it hardest to settle.

Re: Langley article : Fri Jan 09, 2015 11:50 am  

Thanks for the well-wishes for the new season, same goes to you. Eagles have been known for being a team with a good spirit so Langers should fit in just fine.

The top 4 isn't out of our reach, the three full-time teams should occupy the top three positions unless something really goes belly up. Featherstone, Halifax, Sheffield, and Dewsbury are all challengers for the top 4 in my opinion. It'll be interesting to say the least.

Re: Langley article : Fri Jan 09, 2015 12:50 pm  

Fat lady hasn't even started tuning up yet.

I noticed Dewsbury's odds for the challenge cup were 250 to 1 less than ours Personally I don't rate them think Batley are in with a better chance

Re: Langley article : Fri Jan 09, 2015 1:24 pm  

westridingeagle wrote:

I noticed Dewsbury's odds for the challenge cup were 250 to 1 less than ours Personally I don't rate them think Batley are in with a better chance

Dewsbury have signed some good calibre players that will stand them in good stead. Wouldn't say they're 250 to 1 better than ours though..