[tb]

: Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:49 am  

… to the women of the world

: Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:50 am  

gutterfax wrote:

8) Glad to be of service.........

Hey it's all good fun, + never know what Friday night may bring.

Back to the Crusaders, if they do take their games away from Bridgend what about the fanbase they've already established there

: Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:50 am  

tb wrote:

… to the women of the world

: Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:53 am  

Roofs wrote:

Hey it's all good fun, + never know what Friday night may bring.

Chlamydia?

Roofs wrote:

Back to the Crusaders, if they do take their games away from Bridgend what about the fanbase they've already established there

...the same thing that happened to our fans from Charlton and Brentford....they will either make the effort of stop going. It's a 20 minute train ride between Newport and Bridgend, so the true fans will probably do it.

: Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:01 am  

gutterfax wrote:

Chlamydia?


...the same thing that happened to our fans from Charlton and Brentford....they will either make the effort of stop going. It's a 20 minute train ride between Newport and Bridgend, so the true fans will probably do it.

Nah, I'm off out round Hull.

Be a pain though. I wouldn't mind driving outside Hull to see Rovers but it's easier not having to. You'd have though the club would want to get stability and build a fanbase rather then the 'roadshow' idea that appears to be being suggested in the press.

[tb]

: Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:03 am  

Also … isn't the plan to move to Newport for two years, while Bridgend is redeveloped/ new ground built, then move back??

: Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:07 am  

tb wrote:

Also … isn't the plan to move to Newport for two years, while Bridgend is redeveloped/ new ground built, then move back??

Ah right. Newport's pretty much another Union stronghold though really isn't it?
To be honest in the long-run I just can't see it working for them as an SL club, NL1 or 2 maybe but feel it's being way too rushed.

: Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:24 am  

tb wrote:

Also … isn't the plan to move to Newport for two years, while Bridgend is redeveloped/ new ground built, then move back??

Yup!

Same side moaning about how credit crunch meaning they strggling to pay players on time etc... yet planning a new stadium?

Anyone else smell alot of Bull there?

: Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:27 am  

jannerboyuk wrote:

widnes should have loaned him to saints and we would have gone full circle! Does anyone base their statement on any known facts or just what sounds good? rlfans is getting more and more confusing. maybe posts should carry a warning:facts may be plucked from thin air. not having a go at you j20, just wondering if we try to hold ourselves to any standards on this site!

KK!

Am just sure when we got him was through Saints!

Surely you can't loan a player that's not yours can you? Think offically Saints reclaeed him, loaned him to Widnes and then Saints reloaned him back to Cru again for rest of the year!

Still prob needed nod from Cru but he wasn't playing anywho, so that's why from what I gather Saints sent him to Widnes for a bit (enede early with injury)!

: Wed Aug 26, 2009 1:09 pm  

If people read Dalle Court's item they would know that they were all paid on time. Our side as struggled as do all new teams in SL' What I don't understand is that our crowds are much higher than Quins and not far off Salford yet we bear all the criticism and abuse. Over the years I have had to put up with union belittlement but they do it much more nicely than this constant rubbish from up north.