Re: Re: : Mon Dec 14, 2009 6:39 pm  

Rotherham Fev Fan wrote:

you may take the opportunity to read your post again!

Note, I did say 'I don't think I referred to Superleague clubs specifically', thus indicating I was not sure. But I was right, wasn't I? I did refer to the recession.

So a recession occurs - SL clubs shouldn't be required to have new stadia. Is this correct???

In the context of the licensing policy, which is the context of the discussion, I do not think it is appropriate for the RFL to insist upon new stadia as one of the criteria during a recession.

You accused me/my club of double standards earlier but Saints started the process for their own new stadium before the licence criteria were decided; I think even before the licence system was decided. I can't speak for the other Superleague clubs as I don't know their position. However, during a recession (which was not around when this set of licenses were agreed), I think it inappropriate for the RFL to insist upon new stadia as a criteria for a licence.

I am not going to embark upon petty arguments with yet another bitter Championship club fan. Some of you sound like your stuck in the dim and distant past rather than the 21st century and some of you really do need to get a grip.

Re: Re: : Mon Dec 14, 2009 6:52 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

Note, I did say 'I don't think I referred to Superleague clubs specifically', thus indicating I was not sure. But I was right, wasn't I? I did refer to the recession.

In the context of the licensing policy, which is the context of the discussion, I do not think it is appropriate for the RFL to insist upon new stadia as one of the criteria during a recession.

You accused me/my club of double standards earlier but Saints started the process for their own new stadium before the licence criteria were decided; I think even before the licence system was decided. I can't speak for the other Superleague clubs as I don't know their position. However, during a recession (which was not around when this set of licenses were agreed), I think it inappropriate for the RFL to insist upon new stadia as a criteria for a licence.

I am not going to embark upon petty arguments with yet another bitter Championship club fan. Some of you sound like your stuck in the dim and distant past rather than the 21st century and some of you really do need to get a grip.

Whatever our opinions , we do get to watch our teams in modern 21 st century facilities , unlike you

Re: Re: : Mon Dec 14, 2009 6:57 pm  

Starbug wrote:

Whatever our opinions , we do get to watch our teams in modern 21 st century facilities , unlike you

In 18 months time you'll be eating your words, which will give me a tiny bit of satisfaction to witness.

Re: Re: : Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:01 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

In 18 months time you'll be eating your words, which will give me a tiny bit of satisfaction to witness.

I'm so pleased for you

Re: Re: : Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:12 pm  

Starbug wrote:

I'm so pleased for you

I know. It's part of the love you show me whenever I venture on to the Crusaders' board.

Re: Re: : Mon Dec 14, 2009 7:55 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

. Some of you sound like your stuck in the dim and distant past rather than the 21st century and some of you really do need to get a grip.

and if the RFL (just for arguments sake) say Saints ground is a toilet, no more SL for you until you produce a new one, and the fiscal problems persist - I can just hear you shouting - yeh this is the 21st Century! We should be happy we're excluded from SL!!!! - my botty!!

Re: Wrexham? : Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:14 pm  

Rugby league needs 'pot of money' to succeed in Wales, says Leighton Samuel

Rugby league needs 'pot of money' to succeed in Wales, says Leighton Samuel

Re: Wrexham? : Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:58 pm  

Catalancs wrote: Rugby league needs 'pot of money' to succeed in Wales, says Leighton Samuel RFL a farce it a heartlands sport and top players play for money.They wont get the support as it a football area.RFL give up and pack your bags.If i messed up that many times lifes would be lost.

Catalancs wrote: Rugby league needs 'pot of money' to succeed in Wales, says Leighton Samuel RFL a farce it a heartlands sport and top players play for money.They wont get the support as it a football area.RFL give up and pack your bags.If i messed up that many times lifes would be lost.

Re: Wrexham? : Tue Dec 15, 2009 4:12 pm  

But crusaders i wish you all the luck though in wrexham. I just feel sorry it has been taken away from south wales.

Re: Wrexham? : Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:29 am  

hmmm.. let me see South Wales has not turned out in numbers like the south of France for Super League Expansion??? who would have guessed that... however much the "northern" game wants & wishes to expand the core & loyal i.e. fan who will pay to see... is located in the North of this Isle. What if Leigh/Featherstone/Widnes or Halifax has been given the same funding & better Visa advice? Crowds better than 4k per home game would have been acheived, simply by by better away support alone, expand yes but small steps, if Wrexham had been the first step then yes a NL1 team 2 years ago would have been a good step.... but now to save face it is regression with Leigh and Widnes within spitting distance its laughable. Maybe a North Wales Wrexham "crusaders" will work in 2/3 time but it may have slowed or severed rugby league heartland (teams) to a slow beat in the process. We all want the game to expand but don't cut off the roots or the tree won't grow....

Hope this venture works as a the RFL have spent a lot of money on the game in Wales