Re: Keith Senior : Thu Jul 07, 2011 2:24 pm  

Sad to see him leave but it was time for him to go. His defence has been a bit of an issue this season but still can do a job in SL. May be an idea to move him into 2nd row. Hope he becomes as big a favourite with you guys as he was at Leeds

Re: Keith Senior : Thu Jul 07, 2011 3:43 pm  

danmar wrote:

Definitely a done deal- was at the same Klitschko vs Haye house party and was discussing it. Wakey was the initial move for him but their finances are a shed and couldn't put pen to paper.

Had nothing to do with Wakefields finances and everything to do with not been able to guarantee him super league rugby.

Re: Keith Senior : Thu Jul 07, 2011 3:48 pm  

TURFEDOUT wrote:

Had nothing to do with Wakefields finances and everything to do with not been able to guarantee him super league rugby.

heard it on twitter 2 year deal with you

Re: Keith Senior : Thu Jul 07, 2011 3:52 pm  

TURFEDOUT wrote:

Had nothing to do with Wakefields finances and everything to do with not been able to guarantee him super league rugby.

Maybe an element of both, but the finance with Wakefield was definitely an issue and Senior didnt want to leave West Yorkshire as it now means relocating which he didn't want to do. Wakey was first choice but couldnt be done, one for financial reasons and two for uncertainty of SL licence.

Re: Keith Senior : Sun Jul 10, 2011 12:31 pm  

i wonder if hell end up in the forwrds for you guys? its always been said hed end up as a forward with his size.

Re: Keith Senior : Sun Jul 10, 2011 3:47 pm  

danmar wrote:

Maybe an element of both, but the finance with Wakefield was definitely an issue and Senior didnt want to leave West Yorkshire as it now means relocating which he didn't want to do. Wakey was first choice but couldnt be done, one for financial reasons and two for uncertainty of SL licence.

We can't offer anyone a decent contract at the moment you muppet. Glover has the readies to spend but why do this now.

Re: Keith Senior : Sun Jul 10, 2011 9:08 pm  

supercat wrote:

We can't offer anyone a decent contract at the moment you muppet. Glover has the readies to spend but why do this now.

I thought all contracts had a clause that made then null and void if the club were not in SL? In which case surely Wakey should be planning for next year unless the club know different?

Re: Keith Senior : Mon Jul 11, 2011 4:31 pm  

Traffic wrote:

I thought all contracts had a clause that made then null and void if the club were not in SL? In which case surely Wakey should be planning for next year unless the club know different?

Ye they know