Re: NWC Div 5 2010/11 : Wed Mar 30, 2011 7:40 pm  

west bank wrote:

Westhoughton have conceded to widnes tigers

West Bank it is my understanding this game is getting re arranged for 2 weeks time although I could well be wrong

Re: NWC Div 5 2010/11 : Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:13 pm  

West Bank - we have NOT conceeded to Widnes, it has been re-arranged for 16th April, as Serginho said.

Re: NWC Div 5 2010/11 : Sat Apr 02, 2011 5:39 pm  

Bury 50 - 16 Crosfields

Scoreline probably says it all - I'm pleased with that win, we only had one half-back available and lost him injured in first half, with several other first stringers missing...then lost a couple more to injuries but the boys did well and for the most played a good, controlled game with some nice attacking play - if we'd had a decent kicker could have been 60. Big wraps and credit to Crosfields, who came with loads of kids but never stopped running.

A few of their older lads need to address their cheap shots though. It was the same at their gaff a few weeks ago and yet again there were knees and elbows flying in all over, often very late. You don't need to do it boys, it lets you down badly.

Any news from Chorley vs Eccleston? Has Westhoughton vs Widnes been rearranged?

Re: NWC Div 5 2010/11 : Sat Apr 02, 2011 5:58 pm  

Eccleston beat Chorley 24-14 i think.

Re: NWC Div 5 2010/11 : Sun Apr 03, 2011 10:33 pm  

Serginho wrote:

West Bank it is my understanding this game is getting re arranged for 2 weeks time although I could well be wrong

Red4life wrote:

West Bank - we have NOT conceeded to Widnes, it has been re-arranged for 16th April, as Serginho said.

How did this get rearranged? I thought the concrete, inflexible, non-negotiable rule was NO free weekends, NO rearranged games, etc...not a dig at Westhoughton or Widnes, just wondering how this was achieved?

Re: NWC Div 5 2010/11 : Sun Apr 03, 2011 11:17 pm  

i dont know to be honest pal maybe some one will come on and clarify, but in my years of playing under northwest counties they seem to not be as fixed in with their original mindset once the league has been won / or the majority of the league games have been said, this being said maybe it was an issue with the teams facilities and good to see bothe teams reached an agreement early on in the week so i dont see the issue. Nothing pi55es me off more than seeing 18-0 nils and yesterday i think approx 35% of games were not fulfilled across all nwc divisions and cups, total shambles if you ask me and a tougher punishment should be brought in for next year.

On your hand mate good to see you have fielded a team and got a good result, you never know what crossfields team are gonna turn up especially when their first aint got a game like what always seems to happen to us at boars, i would just concentrate on keeping your number high hopefully on the back of that result you will start to see some off them knocks healing quicker than when your on the back of a drumming.

Wild Boars vs Chester 32-18
Not the best performance from the wild boars but lets say the result was never in doubt, with 6,7 and 9 all missing and other key men out we knew it would be a back to basics game, we got an early try and kept the pressure on to dominate the arm wrestle. We must have bombed about 6 or 7 tries and i put this down to the new blood in key positions. However credit to chester kept plodding along big side and got round the pitch very well and 2 consilation tries in the last couple of minutes made the game look closer than it was, with out being disrespectful on another day we would have put 50+ passed them but we came to get a win and left with a win and based on the circumstances we was happy with the day. I think we need friendlys now to stop the rust setting in before the semi's no game for 2 weeks was bad enough but 4 weeks will be awful so if any teams aint got a game maybe calling wildboars would be an option

Good results for our division with Wigan bulldogs and rylands making it through to the semi's to join us and hindley, shame hindley got given the game but this may work against them as rust may set in for them too

Re: NWC Div 5 2010/11 : Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:25 pm  

Pazzer wrote:

Nothing pi55es me off more than seeing 18-0 nils and yesterday i think approx 35% of games were not fulfilled across all nwc divisions and cups, total shambles if you ask me and a tougher punishment should be brought in for next year.

Totally agree,

Re: NWC Div 5 2010/11 : Tue Apr 05, 2011 12:11 pm  

Again Crosfields with the cheap shots. Without sounding like an old moaning get, it could result in a bad injury. Its well out of order, a few digs here and there is part of the game, but they take it to the extreme. Punches in back play when a lads back is turned, trying to gouge eyes etc. Not good

Re: NWC Div 5 2010/11 : Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:14 pm  

Crosfields number 6 must have been about 18-19 got a sly punch in when Burys number 10 scored a try

Re: NWC Div 5 2010/11 : Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:39 pm  

monkeytowner wrote:

Crosfields number 6 must have been about 18-19 got a sly punch in when Burys number 10 scored a try

wasnt very sly! just punched him from the side in full view of everyone there straight after a try was scored!!!... and off he went for 10 minutes.