Re: NWC Divsion 3 2010/11 : Fri Feb 11, 2011 1:29 pm  

chenko wrote:

irlamhornet2010 your full of tosh i like how these facts dont seem to be mentioned by you. your team tried to bully us from the start and got what they deserved in a short fight NOT a brawl as you state also i didnt hit from behind or run away i stode toe to toe with the second row (bald head guy) who cheap shot me as me and your centre tried to calm it down and as for shithouses what about your winger running in punching from the blind side then running back to your touch line for protection. your big lad who claimed to be nutted didnt see him wanting to get stuck in to me for doing it he just wanted to complain to the ref !!!!!!

as for the higgy bashers get better alarms on your cars fellas when ever you may have to come here again because they may not be there after you have played once the estate lads get shown this hahahahahahahahahahahahaha !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

cowiesarse i took it as a compliment pal cheers

We went down to Irlam with a young side average age was 21 and straight from kick off all they sent out to do was rough us up and intimdate us. In the first 10 minutes one of there players blatantly booted our hooker in the back and the referee did f*** all the was an old guy with glasses what joke he was. Then our 17 year old stand off was retreving the ball back after it had been kicked out of play and one the player puched him in the face and we got f*** all again. Think the end score was 24 - 46 to Irlam but I was well pleased with our team for standing up to them. When you play teams like spring view / west bank you get tough hard games but they play with in the rules of the game Irlam just wanted to prove how much they could hurt and intimidate our team any way they could. Having said that they did play some really good rugby at points and they are were they are in the league for that reason

Re: NWC Divsion 3 2010/11 : Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:49 pm  

Well said ulvie lad

Why do you think irlam ain't beaten SV? Only one answer because they can't intimidate them. Having played most teams in div 2 who are not easily intimidated irlam will struggle. What you have to realize is that playing rugby will always win you more games in the higher leagues than using intimidating tactics as the refs get better and don't stand for any of it.

Re: NWC Divsion 3 2010/11 : Fri Feb 11, 2011 7:14 pm  

end of the day we are all guilty at times of throwing our weight around, and in the past we have done our fair share, one thing we have improved on this year is using aggression at the right times in the right way, automatically improves your disciplline....and that for me is the difference in this years SV and last years. I still say the best hiding we have had was WB at our place last year, that game was not strewn with penalties that you might expect in a 0-24 reverse, but may have been the hardest game iv ever played in, as were the other games west bank, woolston, dalton, askam and all the other games v the top established sides...V irlam we did not play our best stuff but we kept our heads and got the job done. lets not muck about, Irlam are a top side and i honestly think have more than matched us in both games home and away.

bytheway, cant believe nobodys given me the byker grove gags....miserable chutes!!

Re: NWC Divsion 3 2010/11 : Sun Feb 13, 2011 10:24 am  

higgy 12 finch 10

Re: NWC Divsion 3 2010/11 : Sun Feb 13, 2011 10:39 am  

Hindpool 34-28 Langworthy

Was a stop start game due to the apalling referee who seemed more bothered about dishing out cards. 4 yellows and 2 reds and it wasnt even a dirty game. Massive credit to Langworthy who turned up understrength and give it a real go although I do feel that with a different ref allowing the game to flow then we would have won a lot more convinvingly.

Re: NWC Divsion 3 2010/11 : Sun Feb 13, 2011 2:07 pm  

irlamhornets2010 wrote:

that fat number 4 started the brawl in the irlam vs higgy game. shithouses only hit from behind then run away. in the in irlam vs view game it was the bald number 11, i think he got put on his booty, holdin his head moanin like a baby. how can anybody say we r a team that brawls al the time, these r only r brawls of the season. ppl start them, we just finish them. n to higgy if they did pick a 3rd divison team i dont think any of ur team would get in it. id pick burtonwood players ova any of yours. n a lot more than 2 from r team would get in it. and so what if any body from the 2nd divison wanna get in on the act, us n the view r avein a laugh with a team we will b playin next season

GET REAL , im the n/4 u said started a fight an ran off (please) ur little humpa lumpa n/6 started it then 5 of u ugly little shits jumped me (without puttin me down or makin a mark on me) an the 1 wiv the cut under his eye got a little slap not my fault he cuts easy . you av got a good side but most of ur players r raging steroids dicks an i am fat but none of ur supermen put me down

Re: NWC Divsion 3 2010/11 : Sun Feb 13, 2011 2:15 pm  

Cowiesarse wrote:

end of the day we are all guilty at times of throwing our weight around, and in the past we have done our fair share, one thing we have improved on this year is using aggression at the right times in the right way, automatically improves your disciplline....and that for me is the difference in this years SV and last years. I still say the best hiding we have had was WB at our place last year, that game was not strewn with penalties that you might expect in a 0-24 reverse, but may have been the hardest game iv ever played in, as were the other games west bank, woolston, dalton, askam and all the other games v the top established sides...V irlam we did not play our best stuff but we kept our heads and got the job done. lets not muck about, Irlam are a top side and i honestly think have more than matched us in both games home and away.

bytheway, cant believe nobodys given me the byker grove gags....miserable chutes!!

Fair comment Cowiesarse - SV have had a great season and are a good side, I agree Irlam have matched you both games but credit where credit is due you got the 2 points both times. I don't think there are many shrinking violets in amateur RL and sometimes it boils over whoever is playing, its in the nature of the game. Discipline and rugby ability as people mentioned win rugby games 99% of the time and that is the right way and how it should be.

Division 3 has been very competitive this year and credit has to go to all the sides, hardly anyone has been tanked and anyone can beat anyone on the day

Re: NWC Divsion 3 2010/11 : Sun Feb 13, 2011 2:39 pm  

Fred_The_SCR wrote:

Fair comment Cowiesarse - SV have had a great season and are a good side, I agree Irlam have matched you both games but credit where credit is due you got the 2 points both times. I don't think there are many shrinking violets in amateur RL and sometimes it boils over whoever is playing, its in the nature of the game. Discipline and rugby ability as people mentioned win rugby games 99% of the time and that is the right way and how it should be.

Division 3 has been very competitive this year and credit has to go to all the sides, hardly anyone has been tanked and anyone can beat anyone on the day

most sensible post on here for a long time pal

any more results from yesterday as there not on league republic yet ????

Re: NWC Divsion 3 2010/11 : Sun Feb 13, 2011 2:59 pm  

heysham 18-0 burtonwood
Higgys 12 - 10 finch
Hind 34 - 24 lang, sounds a cracker
Ulv v Leyland OFF
Pilks 0 - 18 SV

Re: NWC Divsion 3 2010/11 : Sun Feb 13, 2011 3:05 pm  

Cowiesarse wrote:

heysham 18-0 burtonwood
Higgys 12 - 10 finch
Hind 34 - 24 lang, sounds a cracker
Ulv v Leyland OFF
Pilks 0 - 18 SV

did piks and burtonwood not turn up or were they close games ???