: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:12 pm  

THE BOARD wrote:

We have HD in west hull. Crystal clear knock on !

Oh well it must have been a knock on then

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:13 pm  

Ull Lad wrote:

I must admit it was a bit harsh, it should have been allowed (B.o.t.d)

Why when there was no doubt?

Or are you another who laps up everything Stevo says...

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:14 pm  

Glenn Morangie wrote:

Why when there was no doubt?

If there was no doubt why is it still being discussed?

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:14 pm  

roversmad wrote:

Oh well it must have been a knock on then

But you're over it right...

[Kosh]

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:14 pm  

roversmad wrote:

Oh well it must have been a knock on then

Just as a matter of interest, if you don't think that Webster touched the ball, what do you think caused it to change direction and rotation in mid-air?

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:15 pm  

roversmad wrote:

If there was no doubt why is it still being discussed?

Sore losers whining is my guess.

[Kosh]

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:16 pm  

roversmad wrote:

If there was no doubt why is it still being discussed?

Because some people can't accept the truth.

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:16 pm  

Kosh wrote:

Just as a matter of interest, if you don't think that Webster touched the ball, what do you think caused it to change direction and rotation in mid-air?

Was there a gyroscope in the ball?

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:16 pm  

Kosh wrote:

Just as a matter of interest, if you don't think that Webster touched the ball, what do you think caused it to change direction and rotation in mid-air?

I never said he didnt touch it
when i first saw it i thought he did but then i wasnt so sure on other replays

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:18 pm  

Kosh wrote:

Just as a matter of interest, if you don't think that Webster touched the ball, what do you think caused it to change direction and rotation in mid-air?

Was it...

a) The ball didnt move direction.
b) The wind.
c) A ghost.
d) None of the above and ok he must have touched it.