Re: Campese : Mon Mar 14, 2016 7:31 pm  

SirStan wrote:

:lol:

Call me a savant, but I am spotting a strange pattern.

Re: Campese : Mon Mar 14, 2016 7:51 pm  

hull smallears wrote:

Call me a savant, but I am spotting a strange pattern.

You sir are a savant

Re: Campese : Mon Mar 14, 2016 8:35 pm  

fun time frankie wrote:

We went through the middle eights without campese or Kelly unbeaten I know you want rid and nothing will change your mind but let's see what happens

Something did change my mind mate,when he 1st came I felt we were courting disaster signing him,after 13 games I changed my mind and felt it was a masterstroke. He then got crocked and has played 42 minutes since and I changed my mind again,all I want is whats best for my club and will continue to support them whatever.

Re: Campese : Mon Mar 14, 2016 8:49 pm  

deslawson wrote:

Something did change my mind mate,when he 1st came I felt we were courting disaster signing him,after 13 games I changed my mind and felt it was a masterstroke. He then got crocked and has played 42 minutes since and I changed my mind again,all I want is whats best for my club and will continue to support them whatever.

Every signing is a risk Mickey Paea came with a bit of an injury record and played 50 games on the trot whereas Ryan O'Hara came with a good record and played 12 games in 2 seasons

Re: Campese : Mon Mar 14, 2016 8:53 pm  

Surprised nobodies criticised the decision to play him and Lunt off the bench, hamstrings are more likely in substitutes due to a shorter warm up compared to starting players. would have been better with Campese on from the off and bring him off if he fatigues.

Re: Campese : Mon Mar 14, 2016 8:53 pm  

It's unfortunate. But it's been a failure. Luck plays a big part in signing players like campese. We just ain't that lucky.
We still have cap space left. Enough to sign one maybe two players. Why hasn't this been used? Or is the club doing a Wakefield and using it up when it really matters??
We could do with a Puletua and Chisholm right now.

Re: Campese : Mon Mar 14, 2016 8:56 pm  

Hessle rover wrote:

It's unfortunate. But it's been a failure. Luck plays a big part in signing players like campese. We just ain't that lucky.
We still have cap space left. Enough to sign one maybe two players. Why hasn't this been used? Or is the club doing a Wakefield and using it up when it really matters??
We could do with a Puletua and Chisholm right now.

Why spend money just for the sake of it? There clearly isn't the available quality in the market, given we have zero room for manoeuvre in the overseas market.

Re: Campese : Mon Mar 14, 2016 8:58 pm  

SirStan wrote:

Why spend money just for the sake of it? There clearly isn't the available quality in the market, given we have zero room for manoeuvre in the overseas market.

That's not true we've a centre coming over to play second row.........Oh wait.

Re: Campese : Mon Mar 14, 2016 10:33 pm  

SirStan wrote:

Forgive my ignorance, I just googled that.

Was one of your own who christened him/her as such but seems pretty appropriate to me

Re: Campese : Mon Mar 14, 2016 11:36 pm  

Jake the Peg wrote:

Was one of your own who christened him/her as such but seems pretty appropriate to me