: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:57 pm  

Sheldon wrote:

really? i'd have thought webster over any distance tbh.

going forwards probably, going back he is slower than Wellens

: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:59 pm  

General Zod. wrote:

Didn't compare Fozzard's or Graham's speed.

fozzard stronger than Graham

fozzard is an average prop, tough and a bit of grunt but thats it

Graham is a world class player, one of very few we have, the only aspect of the game fozzard excels in is leading with the elbow and raising his knees into the tackle

: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:09 pm  

SmokeyTA wrote:

fozzard stronger than Graham

fozzard is an average prop, tough and a bit of grunt but thats it

Graham is a world class player, one of very few we have, the only aspect of the game fozzard excels in is leading with the elbow and raising his knees into the tackle

Learn to read!

: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:53 pm  

EL CAMO wrote:

Learn to read!

Think thats twice now, what a fool lol

: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:57 pm  

General Zod. wrote:

Have a look and tell me which one's you disagree with...

This could take a while.

Wellens v Briscoe - Wellens is the bigger, Briscoe quicker
Gardner v Fox - Gardner is bigger, Fox possible quicker
Gidley v Walker - Walker on both (however still not fit to wipe Gidley's backside)
Gilmour v Webster - Webster is bigger, Gilmour far, far quicker
Armstrong v Colbon - Similar size, Colbon is as slow as a tax rebate
Long v Dobson - Long bigger, Dobson probably quicker due to Longs age
Eastmond v l'Anson - Eastmond quicker, don't know on size, don't know who HKR one is!
Graham v Fozzard - Graham on both
Cunningham v Fitzhenry - not worth debating, Cunningham is royalty
Hargreaves v Aizue - Aizue on both (I think)
Clough v Galea - God knows
Puletua v Newton - size Puletua, speed Puletua
Wilkin v Murrell - God knows

Roby v Fisher - Roby on speed, similar size
Frodsham v Netherton - Frodsham is massive for his age and fairly quick
Fa'asavalu v Lovegrove - Faas on both
Wheeler v Cockayne - Cockayne is rubbish so not interested

General Zod. wrote:

In summary there's only Gidley and Wilkin who would be faster than their opposite Rovers player and on the whole Rover are a bigger side, particularly out wide.

In summary, HKR are made up of of a few overrated foreigners, a couple of Wigan rejects and a couple of blokes I have never heard of.

Saints by plenty, by miles even!

: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:26 pm  

Stirlingshire Saint wrote:

This could take a while.

Wellens v Briscoe - Wellens is the bigger, Briscoe quicker
Gardner v Fox - Gardner is bigger, Fox possible quicker
Gidley v Walker - Walker on both (however still not fit to wipe Gidley's backside)
Gilmour v Webster - Webster is bigger, Gilmour far, far quicker
Armstrong v Colbon - Similar size, Colbon is as slow as a tax rebate
Long v Dobson - Long bigger, Dobson probably quicker due to Longs age
Eastmond v l'Anson - Eastmond quicker, don't know on size, don't know who HKR one is!
Graham v Fozzard - Graham on both
Cunningham v Fitzhenry - not worth debating, Cunningham is royalty
Hargreaves v Aizue - Aizue on both (I think)
Clough v Galea - God knows
Puletua v Newton - size Puletua, speed Puletua
Wilkin v Murrell - God knows

Roby v Fisher - Roby on speed, similar size
Frodsham v Netherton - Frodsham is massive for his age and fairly quick
Fa'asavalu v Lovegrove - Faas on both
Wheeler v Cockayne - Cockayne is rubbish so not interested



In summary, HKR are made up of of a few overrated foreigners, a couple of Wigan rejects and a couple of blokes I have never heard of.

Saints by plenty, by miles even!

You are annoying.
Go away.

: Thu Feb 26, 2009 8:30 pm  

Stirlingshire Saint wrote:

snip

Can't be arsed anymore

: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:17 pm  

Stirlingshire Saint wrote:

This could take a while.

Wellens v Briscoe - Wellens is the bigger, Briscoe quicker
Gardner v Fox - Gardner is bigger, Fox possible quicker
Gidley v Walker - Walker on both (however still not fit to wipe Gidley's backside)
Gilmour v Webster - Webster is bigger,Gilmour [ar, far quicker
Armstrong v Colbon - Similar size, Colbon is as slow as a tax rebate
Long v Dobson - Long bigger, Dobson probably quicker due to Longs age
Eastmond v l'Anson - Eastmond quicker, don't know on size, don't know who HKR one is!
Graham v Fozzard - Graham on both
Cunningham v Fitzhenry - not worth debating, Cunningham is royalty
Hargreaves v Aizue - Aizue on both (I think)
Clough v Galea - God knows
Puletua v Newton - size Puletua, speed Puletua
Wilkin v Murrell - God knows

Roby v Fisher - Roby on speed, similar size
Frodsham v Netherton - Frodsham is massive for his age and fairly quick
Fa'asavalu v Lovegrove - Faas on both
Wheeler v Cockayne - Cockayne is rubbish so not interested



In summary, HKR are made up of of a few overrated foreigners, a couple of Wigan rejects and a couple of blokes I have never heard of.

Saints by plenty, by miles even!

Fox is far quicker than Gardner and no way is Gilmour "far, far quicker" than Webster. Lovegrove is pretty nippy and plays centre also, so I doubt Fas is quicker!

I expect a Saints win tomorrow, you obviously have a much stronger side, but some of your evalutions are also one eyed and amusing! And allthough no doubt Graham is the better player, I'm not so sure he's bigger than Fozzard. Daniel Anderson didnt seem to think so when refering to Fozz as possibily "the biggest body you have" when you were missing a few big blokes last year.

: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:32 pm  

Whilst reading this post was fun, lets get to reality. I can't see HKR getting anything from St's, therefore i'm going to plump for a 34-18 Saints victory.

: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:58 am  

http://www.skysports.com/rugbyleague/ma ... 64,00.html Graham is in saints squad according to sky

http://www.skysports.com/rugbyleague/ma ... 64,00.html Graham is in saints squad according to sky