: Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:11 pm  

Have to say, I thought it should have been BOD. While he probably did, you can't conclusively say that he touched the ball with his hand.

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:13 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote:

Morgan in rank hypocrisy shocker

Hull KR coach Justin Morgan brushed off Steve Ganson's controversial late decision that led to his side's match-winning try in the derby game with Hull FC in Cardiff.

"It is what the referee says. We have been on the end of good and bad calls all season," he said.

"Everyone is on the end of bad calls. It's what's gone in the little box at the end of the day and it's us that got two points. That's all that matters.

FFS it was last season - get over it.

Anyway, the ball hit berrigan's left forearm.

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:53 pm  

General Zod. wrote:

FFS it was last season - get over it.

Anyway, the ball hit berrigan's left forearm.

I am over it. I was pointing out Morgan's hypocrisy. He admitted it was a bad call by Ganson in Cardiff but said you get good and bad calls and have to live with it. This in a situation when Rovers won by 5 points.

Rovers get a bad decision against them and lose by 8, and a "bad call" (which was actually correct) is then entirely blamed for the defeat. Is that entirely consistent, in your opinion?

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:57 pm  

barton baird wrote:

Got to say it was lucky for Leeds the cameras were there.

Not really. If the cameras weren't there then Donald and Senior would've probably been given tries before that anyway.

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:32 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote:

I am over it. I was pointing out Morgan's hypocrisy. He admitted it was a bad call by Ganson in Cardiff but said you get good and bad calls and have to live with it. This in a situation when Rovers won by 5 points.

Rovers get a bad decision against them and lose by 8, and a "bad call" (which was actually correct) is then entirely blamed for the defeat. Is that entirely consistent, in your opinion?

How the hell is it hypocracy, the call at MM last season was GOOD, the one on Friday was BAD.

Sounds like the truth to me.

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:43 pm  

rover49 wrote:

How the hell is it hypocracy, the call at MM last season was GOOD, the one on Friday was BAD.

Sounds like the truth to me.

On the one hand he's saying a bad call is immaterial in the context of a game, these things even themselves out and are irrelevant. When Rovers win by 5.

On the other he's saying one bad call, which was actually a good call, is the entire reason for a result. When Rovers lose by 8.

[Kosh]

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:56 pm  

rover49 wrote:

How the hell is it hypocracy, the call at MM last season was GOOD, the one on Friday was BAD.

Sounds like the truth to me.

No it wasn't.

Get over it.

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:39 pm  

rover49 wrote:

How the hell is it hypocracy, the call at MM last season was GOOD, the one on Friday was BAD.

Sounds like the truth to me.

I didnt quite see it that way !!!!!

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:43 pm  

It was knocked on, if that had been Leeds and it had been given, I'd have been pi$$ ed off.

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 10:48 pm  

CHURCHILL wrote:

It was knocked on, if that had been Leeds and it had been given, I'd have been pi$$ ed off.

If it had been Leeds its WOULD have been given dont worry about that