[Kosh]

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 11:49 am  

Lee Tucker FC Fan 2006 wrote: tell that to justin http://www.sporthull.co.uk/rugby_league ... 1188#views He ought to have kept his mouth shut as he's just made himself look bitter and stupid with those remarks. For the 'full speed replay' merchants on this thread - on the SLE show it was reported that Smith said he thought it was a knock-on right from the start and just used the slow-mo to be absolutely sure.

Lee Tucker FC Fan 2006 wrote: tell that to justin http://www.sporthull.co.uk/rugby_league ... 1188#views He ought to have kept his mouth shut as he's just made himself look bitter and stupid with those remarks. For the 'full speed replay' merchants on this thread - on the SLE show it was reported that Smith said he thought it was a knock-on right from the start and just used the slow-mo to be absolutely sure.

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:31 pm  

*jonny* wrote:

Benefit of doubt is only used when the footage is inconclusive. Webster clearly knocked on.

clearly, after 17 replays

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 5:40 pm  

sandy wrote:

clearly, after 17 replays

Got to say it was lucky for Leeds the cameras were there.

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 5:48 pm  

whether it was or it wasnt, youll see worse trys awarded over the season

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:32 pm  

It wasnt his hand it was his knee. I should know, I saw it full speed from directly behind from the south stand. Dont believe me, ask the guy next to me on the grassy knoll, he saw it clearly through his rifle sight.

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 2:39 pm  

knocker norton wrote:

No discussion at all. Webster knocked on!

you WILL see worse given this season, if we had been 20 points up I think it might have gone our way, but with it being a game winner in a tight game I think the benefit was given to Leeds, who then went on to score and win.

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 2:46 pm  

rover49 wrote:

you WILL see worse given this season....

Indeed and if it wasn't a tv match I am sure that both his and Donalds would have been given, however as there was a video ref both were referred 'upstairs'.

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 3:11 pm  

Touches it or not, try or not! makes no odds, Leeds would have still beaten your lot. Think yourselfs lucky the ref kept you in the game so long with the persistant biased penalty blowing in your favour.

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 3:42 pm  

rover49 wrote:

you WILL see worse given this season, if we had been 20 points up I think it might have gone our way, but with it being a game winner in a tight game I think the benefit was given to Leeds, who then went on to score and win.

There was no benefit of the doubt needed. It was clear to see on the replay the ball rotation change when his hand hit it. If there wasnt a video ref it would have been given as a try but thats what VRs are for isnt it, to disallow tries that should be disallowed?

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 3:58 pm  

Lee Tucker FC Fan 2006 wrote: tell that to justin http://www.sporthull.co.uk/rugby_league ... 1188#views Morgan in rank hypocrisy shocker Hull KR coach Justin Morgan brushed off Steve Ganson's controversial late decision that led to his side's match-winning try in the derby game with Hull FC in Cardiff. "It is what the referee says. We have been on the end of good and bad calls all season," he said. "Everyone is on the end of bad calls. It's what's gone in the little box at the end of the day and it's us that got two points. That's all that matters.

Lee Tucker FC Fan 2006 wrote: tell that to justin http://www.sporthull.co.uk/rugby_league ... 1188#views Morgan in rank hypocrisy shocker Hull KR coach Justin Morgan brushed off Steve Ganson's controversial late decision that led to his side's match-winning try in the derby game with Hull FC in Cardiff. "It is what the referee says. We have been on the end of good and bad calls all season," he said. "Everyone is on the end of bad calls. It's what's gone in the little box at the end of the day and it's us that got two points. That's all that matters.