Re: Saints match : Sat Feb 27, 2016 3:47 pm  

looked a lot more than 6,500 there to me

Re: Saints match : Sat Feb 27, 2016 5:28 pm  

At least we had some line speed in defense and a deeper line in attack.
With a decent ref we would have hammered Saints, Shaw's try was good, they scored from a blatent forward pass and then got away with a knock on for the next try. I thought Bentham had a shocker but most of the officials are crap. To my mind the touch officials should have a flag like American football and when they see an infringement it should be thrown on to the pitch.

Re: Saints match : Sat Feb 27, 2016 6:19 pm  

Keith_Lard wrote:

looked a lot more than 6,500 there to me

Looked about right to me.

Re: Saints match : Sat Feb 27, 2016 9:48 pm  

Pickering Red wrote:

I reckon Green will get a ban for applying makeup to Travis Burns. Green will get 4 games because we are Hull KR and Burns will get £1000 of Max Factor vouchers by way of compensation and goodwill from the RFL towards cheek filler.

Assuming Clarkson goes the same way as Greenwood with his concussion and Albert Kelly's hamstring fails to heal, we are looking at a squad of 16 fit players for next week at Widnes.

Heard it on extremely good and reliable authority last night that Luauki arrives from Bradford next week, so he might get a run out in the halves for 5 minutes before he gets sent off. Deep joy.

Can't remember a season with so many disruptions and problems for one team.

Even if we were down to 2 fit players I wouldn't want us to sign Ena Sharples. She's f#cking rubbish. 10 minutes of penalties to the opposition and little else.

Re: Saints match : Sun Feb 28, 2016 12:01 pm  

chissitt wrote:

Unfit!!! He didn't look unfit when he chased and caught Swift and saved what looked a certain try.

Err, it was a try!