: Sat Feb 21, 2009 5:08 pm  

i saw him interviewed on sky sports news after i got in from the game, he needs to stay off the telly with a face like that, his nose could be used by plastic surgery students

But he did have a great game, one of the bravest about.

and if you watch the break he makes up the middle he gets a slap around the head off Lee Smith before handing on to Dobson (where Sinfield takes the loose ball) another head shot but no pen thou.

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 3:43 pm  

THE BOARD wrote:

Come on you dont believe that !

I do, and always have done.

: Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:14 pm  

Outstanding full back and has the kind of spirt coaches would give a right arm for to have in every player.

Definetly a contender for MOM on Friday IMO.

: Mon Feb 23, 2009 3:27 pm  

I love the convoluted disciplinary process:

Incident considered High tackle in 71st minute
Decision No charge
Details of Charge / Reason for NF No high tackle.

It was fairly pointless even asking the panel to consider it as a high tackle.

: Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:07 pm  

Highlander wrote:

I love the convoluted disciplinary process:

Incident considered High tackle in 71st minute
Decision No charge
Details of Charge / Reason for NF No high tackle.

It was fairly pointless even asking the panel to consider it as a high tackle.

Is that the hit on Bailey? What on earth was it considered for?

: Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:12 pm  

Chris28 wrote:

Is that the hit on Bailey? What on earth was it considered for?

Sinfield probably asked Bentham to put a word in.

: Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:22 pm  

j_hunter_hkr wrote:

Sinfield probably asked Bentham to put a word in.

Your probably right, or was it Bentahm asking Sinfield if he wanted it on report.

: Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:45 pm  

Chris28 wrote:

Is that the hit on Bailey? What on earth was it considered for?

A player was left prone on the ground and none of the officials saw what happened. A more perfect example of how video evidence is of benefit you couldn't wish to see.

: Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:57 pm  

trys'r'us wrote:

A player was left prone on the ground and none of the officials saw what happened. A more perfect example of how video evidence is of benefit you couldn't wish to see.

What concerns me is the level of incidents being referred against action taken, if you look at this weeks it clear that officials are getting lazy.

: Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:30 pm  

Chris28 wrote:

Is that the hit on Bailey? What on earth was it considered for?

I may be wrong but i think any tackle that results in a head injury of some kind has to be reviewed

And like the old saying, if you know youve got nothing to worry about then whats the fuss