RFL in "talking bollox" shocker

Whatever it was, was a moment of filthy play and he has what he deserves.

We have a winner of the "kettle calling pot" competition!

I hear the RFL are looking for a new PR man. You should apply. When they ask you the question - "what attracts you to this position?", you can repeat your ready prepared answer above.

Some of the blatant forward passes getting missed or ignored are making the game a joke. Just watch that Huddersfield pass in the Catalan game disgraceful miss by the linesman and the ref. Both stood nearby did nothing gave the try. No wonder the French kicked off the RFL will fine them for having a pop at the officials. Standard of refs is Barry White.

Ha ha ha, of course you do because you've been made to look stupid and can't admit you are wrong.



As you said, time to move on!!

I've no problem admitting when i'm wrong. But only when I actually am.

A poster on the fc rumours thread made 7 predictions,5 are right and the other 2 maybe right which is pretty good.He said he thought hull had signed daniel vidot as it was on twitter a few days ago, 1865 said "hull had signed him weeks ago" Maybe lee radford gets his info off 1865.

Well, well, well!



User Actions

Following



RFL RefereesVerified account

‏@RFLReferees

.@RobJohnson07035 - The definition on a shoulder charge is arm tucked and rotation. Tackler does neither so happy it's not a shoulder

8:42 AM - 22 Jul 2015



You don't have to apologise lads, it's ok.

If you need a bit of back up to get yourself on that disciplinary panel,DES is your man.

Yet you can't on this occasion even when proven wrong by the RFL review!! Sometimes a little humility and admittance goes a long way to showing the sort of person you are......says it all really.

Well, as the RFLReferees Twitter account (which is controlled by the referees themselves) says, I wasn't wrong.

Congratulations. The last time I looked the RFL could overrule/ disagree refereeing decisions (they are employed by the RFL after all) based on panel reviews - which is exactly what has happened here. On this occasion I'm happy that you're wrong and that you clearly are a complete tool!

You mean you'll trust someone that writes on the website over an actual referee?



Each to their own.









Think it's time you let it go.

Right back at you with that last comment. Lets just agree that I (along with every other sane person who isn't wearing blinkers) think it was a shoulder charge, and you think it wasn't. Does that finally calm you down and make you happy?

Where's he gone?

hes hiding like the rest of us lol

Your hiding place is a bit naff!

Oh come on, now you're just antagonising him, that really isn't fair, we'd both moved on and everything

I'm happy that an actual professional referee, who is an expert in his field, saw the FACT that it wasn't a shoulder charge.



Time to get out of the bitter barn!

On the initial report it said "shoulder charge used", they just contradict themselves and make themselves look even more stupid

I don't even know why I'm getting involved, can't be d to link it and don't even care to be fair. Got bored of the ridiculous, corrupt, I consistant RFL ruining the game a long long time ago.

Anyway, glad we've all agreed that watts didn't shoulder charge kelly

I think he did

You can't change your mind now