Re: Opener versus Cas Tigers : Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:55 pm  

nottinghamtiger wrote:

:!: It's my understanding that Cas film all home and away games independently for video analysis, as do most other clubs.
I have no idea how the panel have found Boudebza guity if not.

I don't think Jamie Peacock and the club would have made such statements if they had been show other footage of the tackle confirming intent and a 4 match ban.

Re: Opener versus Cas Tigers : Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:00 pm  

nottinghamtiger wrote:

:!: It's my understanding that Cas film all home and away games independently for video analysis, as do most other clubs.
I have no idea how the panel have found Boudebza guity if not.

So let's get this right. In your world Cas or a n other have video footage conclusively showing Boudebza deliberately fouling a player causing a year long injury. The rfl see it and ban him for 4 games following charging him with a grade b offence.
No one from the rfl bothers releasing this film to justify a bizarre changing of their own rules and controversial decision.
No media organisation bothers to show it. Cas don't release it....it's no where on social media.
Our Chairman clearly hasn't seen it.
This has been a tragic episode for all involved.

Re: Opener versus Cas Tigers : Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:01 pm  

Well after watching the Salford match, Percival was tackled in the same manner as Shenton last weekend. Percival has gone off injured with crutches. Shall we see what the outcome is!?!

Re: Sami Sauiluma : Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:15 pm  

barham red wrote:

Well it'll be interesting to see how the panel see that tackle on percival

Completely different scenario though where one man was tackling another who was running, not coming in as 3rd man when the tackle was already effected. They'll still probably ban him though to avoid the danger of flying dummies from east hull

Re: Opener versus Cas Tigers : Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:17 pm  

Hessle rover wrote:

Well after watching the Salford match, Percival was tackled in the same manner as Shenton last weekend. Percival has gone off injured with crutches. Shall we see what the outcome is!?!

Same referee as well.

Percival was being chase tackled moving forward and the player tackling from behind was swinging off the ground to halt his momentum until an additional impact front on with another tackler adds extra pressure on the knee when Percivals forward momentum is stopped. No malice, no intent, same type of tackle, similar unfortunate outcome, similar lack of reaction from the Saints players. Not put on report, nor should it have been.

I have been watching and supporting Rugby League since the mid 60s, seen this tackle thousands of times and seen hundreds of adverse injuries to player outcomes.

Re: Sami Sauiluma : Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:18 pm  

Jake the Peg wrote:

Completely different scenario though where one man was tackling another who was running, not coming in as 3rd man when the tackle was already effected. They'll still probably ban him though to avoid the danger of flying dummies from east hull

You are an idiot.

Re: Sami Sauiluma : Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:28 pm  

Jake the Peg wrote:

Completely different scenario though where one man was tackling another who was running, not coming in as 3rd man when the tackle was already effected. They'll still probably ban him though to avoid the danger of flying dummies from east hull

What are you on about? This tackle was very similar. Your black and white specs are steaming up, you'd best give them a wipe.

Re: Sami Sauiluma : Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:30 pm  

Burtons Forearm wrote:

Reading Campo's rfl rant it looks like this poor kid has been royally bummed.

Has this been investigated by the Metropolitan police yet?

Re: Sami Sauiluma : Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:37 pm  

roversmad wrote:

You are an idiot.

The sheer determination to abuse every post he puts up is beginning to amuse me after months and months of being bored and annoyed.

Re: Sami Sauiluma : Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:39 pm  

Pickering Red wrote:

Has this been investigated by the Metropolitan police yet?

Not for another 30 years and then they'll take their time.