: Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:32 pm  

No discussion at all. Webster knocked on!

: Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:36 pm  

kathy kirk wrote:

Even Ray would have seen it - I am Black and White through and through but on first showing it was a try - and then !!!! Sorry no try- but a clear knock on- - but that is the way it is with cameras at a match - If only the cameras were at all games the dicissions like this would perhaps go in your favour who knows

The irony of it is, they were discussing on SKY that if the cameras hadn't been at the game then the try would have been given and Hull KR would have won the game

However, if the cameras hadn't been at the game, the Donald and Senior tries might have been given as well and Leeds might have won by 20 points!

They talk like clueless forum members sometimes!!! (most of the time)

: Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:40 pm  

RescuedBlue wrote:

The irony of it is, they were discussing on SKY that if the cameras hadn't been at the game then the try would have been given and Hull KR would have won the game

However, if the cameras hadn't been at the game, the Donald and Senior tries might have been given as well and Leeds might have won by 20 points!

They talk like clueless forum members sometimes!!! (most of the time)

That's the infuriating thing about them lot on SKY. They bang on about one decision and how this may have turned the game, totally forgetting about other contentious decisions that had happened prior to this.

Swings and roundabouts!!!

: Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:56 pm  

Dibs XIII wrote:

That's the infuriating thing about them lot on SKY. They bang on about one decision and how this may have turned the game, totally forgetting about other contentious decisions that had happened prior to this.

Swings and roundabouts!!!

All true - remember many years ago walking out discussing how a refereing call had robbed us of the game but now its a camera -but all in all I llike the camera but want it at all games.

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:01 am  

it was a knock on now i look at it again.

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:10 am  

kathy kirk wrote:

All true - remember many years ago walking out discussing how a refereing call had robbed us of the game but now its a camera -but all in all I llike the camera but want it at all games.

Yeah tis a shame the rfl didn't have the guts to go with the idea after the trial at The Hull Derby last year.

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:23 am  

It was a knock on (even though Dobson's excellent kick deserved a try).

Had Jakes left hand been an inch or 2 behind the ball we'd have won the game but we coughed up too much possession I'm afraid.

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:40 am  

General Zod. wrote:

It was a knock on (even though Dobson's excellent kick deserved a try).

Had Jakes left hand been an inch or 2 behind the ball we'd have won the game but we coughed up too much possession I'm afraid.

***HEADLINE***

Dibs in shock from General Zod statement!!!

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 1:08 am  

How much we debate the decision , the result wont change.

Rovers can take plenty of positives from the game and then aim to get the points at St Helens next week.

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 1:15 am  

I was absolutely baffled that there was even a debate. It was a clear knock-on and didn't justify the amount of time spent checking.