Re: Opener versus Cas Tigers : Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:26 pm  

hull smallears wrote:

I was being sarcastic, as I think that MR alluded to. FWIW my opinion is that there was nothing in it. (from a deliberate or intentional perspective) Clearly as well it is a natural reaction and indeed the intention of the game to get the player down. 4 games is harsh, would never have happened to a popular club. That said, you can understand an emotive response when a club captain is injured for the season. I guess something needs looking at re third man, but I am at a loss how it could be policed.
When I read your occasional posts in future, I will bear in mind (as i have seen prior evidence also of) your penchant for the dramatic and vitriolic over reaction. Must be something to do with living in a village, but don't take it out on the rest of us.

No one's forcing you to come on here.

Re: Opener versus Cas Tigers : Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:32 pm  

roversmad wrote:

No one's forcing you to come on here.

Indeed they are not. But it gives me so much pleasure. The Terrorist is a true star. You also amuse me I must admit.

Re: Opener versus Cas Tigers : Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:46 pm  

LifeLongHKRFan wrote:

Ban Upheld. RFL = Joke

Watched it a couple of times now and i can't find anything that warrants a 4 game ban tbf .
Let's see if the rfl are as strict on the next case ... ( I won't hold my breath )

Re: Opener versus Cas Tigers : Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:04 pm  

hull smallears wrote:

I was being sarcastic, as I think that MR alluded to. FWIW my opinion is that there was nothing in it. (from a deliberate or intentional perspective) Clearly as well it is a natural reaction and indeed the intention of the game to get the player down. 4 games is harsh, would never have happened to a popular club. That said, you can understand an emotive response when a club captain is injured for the season. I guess something needs looking at re third man, but I am at a loss how it could be policed.
When I read your occasional posts in future, I will bear in mind (as i have seen prior evidence also of) your penchant for the dramatic and vitriolic over reaction. Must be something to do with living in a village, but don't take it out on the rest of us.

Nice one. You post a provocative wind up and my occasional dramatic and vitriolic over reaction generates the above considered and insightful response from you. Result.

I even smiled appreciatively at your living in a village reference. Rumour has it round here that the best place to live for unusual dramatic and vitriolic over reaction is nearby Kirkybymoorside. Their biennial shagatownienight is a must visit, especially once the locals have run out of sheep to service.

I also used to live in North Ferriby. Might have some bearing on my persona.

Re: Opener versus Cas Tigers : Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:28 pm  

Pickering Red wrote:

Nice one. You post a provocative wind up and my occasional dramatic and vitriolic over reaction generates the above considered and insightful response from you. Result.

I even smiled appreciatively at your living in a village reference. Rumour has it round here that the best place to live for unusual dramatic and vitriolic over reaction is nearby Kirkybymoorside. Their biennial shagatownienight is a must visit, especially once the locals have run out of sheep to service.

I also used to live in North Ferriby. Might have some bearing on my persona.

Good stuff, all the best.

Re: Opener versus Cas Tigers : Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:50 am  

☺East-Sard☺ wrote:

I just think it could even start in motion a dangerous precedence that some clubs could even abuse. Ie overstate injuries to sway the judiciary hearings … Of course no one is suggesting that here, but you get the point. If the evidence (tv footage etc) doesn't show enough either way, I don't like how it then falls to the outcome of the incident to dictate/increase the punishment. In as much, guilt has already been decided in the headlines.

Think that precedent was set last year with the tackle Sneyd made on McGuire, think that was deemed a season ender and possible break only for him to be classed as fit for selection at the game 5 days later.

I'm not expecting the JB ruling to set any precedent at all going forward, as someone said earlier in this thread JB suffered from not playing for a 'big boy' club and the media playing of Powell. I'll guarantee that over the next 2 days we'll see worse 3rd man tackles (although hopefully not causing the injury) that will go unpunished

Re: Opener versus Cas Tigers : Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:21 am  

nottinghamtiger wrote:

Interesting. I have mostly seen him play for Cas, during which time he hasn't stood out as particularly dirty (as evidenced by the fact he hasn't been charged for anything during his time at Cas). Nor did I really notice him playing against us for Salford.
My point about his absence wasn't really to do with his children, but to point out that despite your claims Powell sends him out to injure players every week, this can't be true as he hasn't actually played that many games for us.
Perhaps you need to sit on the disciplinary panel if you are spotting foul play that is completely missed by everyone else?

There is always one. I remember one of them accusing Senior of deliberately bringing his knee down on the back of Chev Walkers calf when he broke his leg at Headingley. You can't reason with myopia of this nature!

Re: Opener versus Cas Tigers : Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:35 am  

barham red wrote:

Think that precedent was set last year with the tackle Sneyd made on McGuire, think that was deemed a season ender and possible break only for him to be classed as fit for selection at the game 5 days later.

I'm not expecting the JB ruling to set any precedent at all going forward, as someone said earlier in this thread JB suffered from not playing for a 'big boy' club and the media playing of Powell. I'll guarantee that over the next 2 days we'll see worse 3rd man tackles (although hopefully not causing the injury) that will go unpunished

Unfortunately I think you are correct. They was a similar incident with Mickey Paea ironically against Cas a couple of years ago. At the hearing Radford presented evidence to the committee showing that there were 2/3 tackles that were the same as Paea's that round but the ban was not overturned. Complete lack of consistency.

Re: Opener versus Cas Tigers : Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:03 am  

Club Statement http://www.hullkr.co.uk/club/news/artic ... n-boudebza

Club Statement http://www.hullkr.co.uk/club/news/artic ... n-boudebza

Re: Opener versus Cas Tigers : Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:57 am  

LifeLongHKRFan wrote: Club Statement http://www.hullkr.co.uk/club/news/artic ... n-boudebza Well said Neil, no doubt he'll get fined for stating the truth though

LifeLongHKRFan wrote: Club Statement http://www.hullkr.co.uk/club/news/artic ... n-boudebza Well said Neil, no doubt he'll get fined for stating the truth though