: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:24 pm  

Basil Fawlty wrote:

"Is this the right room for an argument?"

No,this is insults,you stupid git.
(Rovers to edge Wakey b.t.w.)

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:27 pm  

brough could be back for this one i heard

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 10:31 pm  

BIGAL1 wrote:

No banana skins please, our players will slip and get injured


For what its worth i would not be too unhappy if we lost, IF we don't suffer anymore injuries, tight game but KR by 6/8.

But Adams presence is with the players and they'll fight tooth and nail for everything so if you ill prepare you may suffer.

I for one will not be under estimating wakefield, they aren't where they are by some fluke, they have some very good players and a fine coach in John kear.
He will have them fired up you can be sure of that and Rovers will have to be tuned in mentaly as well as physicaly to get a win.
ALL in all i think this game could be a fast end to end type of game and i am looking forward to it, i hope Wakefield do bring a good following with them which will go to create an even greater atmosphere.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:27 pm  

This really is the battle of the Titans, in that we are both form teams. Only difference is you are doing it with basically your best line up and we are not. To me this indicates we are the more likely to break. I can't see us winning, however I would never say never. I for one simply cannot call Trinity games anymore - not since Kear took over. It's one suprise after another.

HKR by 14 or Trinity by 4

: Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:58 am  

barton baird wrote:

No,this is insults,you stupid git.
(Rovers to edge Wakey b.t.w.)

Some lover told me this was tourettes, b@s+*d

: Tue Mar 03, 2009 7:10 am  

General Zod. wrote:

Sunday will be the acid test in terms of our top-four credentials...

Yeah, with wakey being shoe ins for a top 4 finish

: Tue Mar 03, 2009 7:41 am  

Jake the Peg wrote:

Yeah, with wakey being shoe ins for a top 4 finish

Indeed, you can't beat reading the perennial drivel that gets spouted by Zod. Wakefield, that established top 4 side

Wakefield are in good form though, could be a high scoring and close match this one but I'd fancy Rovers to win it.

: Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:11 am  

Jake the Peg wrote:

Yeah, with wakey being shoe ins for a top 4 finish

Where as Hull have been regulars in the top 4 in recent years or is that bottom 4?

: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:04 am  

vastman wrote:

This really is the battle of the Titans, in that we are both form teams. Only difference is you are doing it with basically your best line up and we are not. To me this indicates we are the more likely to break. I can't see us winning, however I would never say never. I for one simply cannot call Trinity games anymore - not since Kear took over. It's one suprise after another.

HKR by 14 or Trinity by 4

Whilst I appreciate you have an horrendous absentee list, it's not right to state we have our best line up available, particularly with Mick Vella sat in the stands. Add Cooke, Gene & Colbon to that, all of whom would make the 17 when available.

: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 pm  

Alphabetti Spaghetti Go! wrote:

Whilst I appreciate you have an horrendous absentee list, it's not right to state we have our best line up available, particularly with Mick Vella sat in the stands. Add Cooke, Gene & Colbon to that, all of whom would make the 17 when available.

Agreed, but you certainly are closer to having a full squad.