: Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:20 pm  

j_hunter_hkr wrote:

Would you like to bet on that?

If we signed Tommy Lee then I'd join you lot in thinking we're signing anyone and everyone you want rid of!

not me.

i cant see why you'd want him either, we've ruined the poor lad.

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:21 pm  

Sheldon wrote:

doubt it mate he doesn't drink anymore, especially in hull, and has moved to huddersfield.

Ive watched Hull long enough to know what he looks like, oh and I played in the same junior side as him. Not disputing that he has moved to Huddersfield - just saying he was there thats all!

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:24 pm  

Irregs #16 wrote:

Ive watched Hull long enough to know what he looks like, oh and I played in the same junior side as him. Not disputing that he has moved to Huddersfield - just saying he was there thats all!

i was been sarcastic.

[Roland_R]

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:27 pm  

Sheldon wrote:

i was been sarcastic.

Your sarcasm sucks

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:32 pm  

1865 wrote:

Your sarcasm sucks

thats what i was missing!!! the loving wink!!!!

[Mild Rover]

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 3:13 pm  

Sheldon wrote:

wasn't having a pop bud, i agree and have always stood up for the lad but it always make me laugh how peoples opinions change.

I didn't think you were.

'...could be bothered to check my old posts' was meant in a 'obviously you won't, because life is too short', rather than a 'why haven't you done your research?' kind of way.

Cheers.

Edit

Sheldon wrote:

not me.

i cant see why you'd want him either, we've ruined the poor lad.

Still could be a moderate SL hooker IMO. Would make me wonder why we had let K. Netherton go, though. I don't want Rovers to sign him, as I think we do now have to start promoting from within for those 'value for money' positions in the squad, at least.

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 3:23 pm  

j_hunter_hkr wrote:

Would you like to bet on that?

If we signed Tommy Lee then I'd join you lot in thinking we're signing anyone and everyone you want rid of!

If you played Lee at hooker he would do well for you or most other SL clubs, would do a better job than Fitzhenry at hooker.

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 3:39 pm  

Dave K. wrote:

If you played Lee at hooker he would do well for you or most other SL clubs, would do a better job than Fitzhenry at hooker.

And you're basing that on....... what exactly? Tommy Lee's previous impressive displays at hooker or "utility player" Daniel Fitzhenry's 2 spells at hooker this year?

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:03 pm  

j_hunter_hkr wrote:

Tommy Lee? No thank you.

I'd prefer his firestarting mate Bruce

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:05 pm  

Basil Fawlty wrote:

I'd prefer his firestarting mate Bruce

Not funny.