: Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:49 am  

Lets face it, maybe he could have seen red but also but for some of the worst decisions from the officials Rovers would have won comfortably, so you cant have it all…

That goes against virtually every match report I have seen!

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:00 am  

redeverready wrote:

If Thaler was so on our side he'd have sent Walker off wouldn't he after 14 v 12 is a lot better isn't it.

He (Thaler) was poor but he didn't force Rovers to drop the ball when clear to the line twice. We make far too many unforced errors and at times we are our own worst enemy.

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:52 am  

It was decisions such as Fozzard knocking on near the line?? Fox knocking on allegedly even though he was facing his own line??

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:15 pm  

redeverready wrote:

If Thaler was so on our side he'd have sent Walker off wouldn't he after 14 v 12 is a lot better isn't it.

Look at the penalty count to get an idea......

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:35 pm  

I thought the Bulls pressure in the 1st half was on the back of a lot of a lot of dodgy decisions, 2nd half it was our own errors.

Some surprising stats from the game on the Super League site - it says we made 56 more tackles (seemed more than that) & they made more handing errors & more clean breaks than we did

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:38 pm  

So it's being proven that Thaler gained you a point.

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:48 pm  

redeverready wrote:

So it's being proven that Thaler gained you a point.

You could also say he saved you a vital penalty nearing the end of the game when Peter Fox looked like he was going to break away for an unstoppable try only to be high/grapple tackled round the head. Swings and rounabouts.

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:52 pm  

moxi1 wrote:

You could also say he saved you a vital penalty nearing the end of the game when Peter Fox looked like he was going to break away for an unstoppable try only to be high/grapple tackled round the head. Swings and rounabouts.

No it's not you should have been down to 12 men which is a fact.

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:45 pm  

redeverready wrote:

No it's not you should have been down to 12 men which is a fact.

Are you saying us going down to 12 men would of guarenteed you a win?

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:08 pm  

SCF wrote:

Are you saying us going down to 12 men would of guarenteed you a win?

Yes.