Re: Next Coach : Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:07 pm  

Jake the Peg wrote:

No, I said from the first time I saw him he was rubbish

So Chesters proving he isn't rubbish whilst Millers proving he still is?

That makes sense.

Re: Next Coach : Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:13 pm  

Whats miller got to do with c. chester? you got rid of him because certain people thought he was the reason behind your form, hes taken over arguably the worst squad in SL and is in line to be coach of the month,Whilst you still flap around near the bottom,As I keep saying he might not be the bad apple at your club, IMO

Re: Next Coach : Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:25 pm  

Chester keeps being brought into the debate by non-Rovers fans. I don't think any Rovers fan wants Chester to fail, he just didn't have our team performing for him. Since Webbo took charge our performances have been much better but the results haven't gone our way, an example is the derby.
The Catalan result was poor but they had the ball for 60 minutes which was due to a number of things, we will come back from this.

Re: Next Coach : Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:27 pm  

SirStan wrote:

So Chesters proving he isn't rubbish whilst Millers proving he still is?

That makes sense.

I know

[Mild Rover]

Re: Next Coach : Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:38 pm  

The point is that we're about as likely to mourn discarding Chester as you are to miss hat trick hero Miller. Very roughly. Or Reece Lyne or Joe Arundel.

I never thought Chester was a bad apple. I wish him well, I just felt he was responsible for a problem that he, himself would not be able to fix.
Now he's gone, he's not going to be a target for Hull fans. In fairness, Peter Gentle shot up in our estimation once Pearson started blaming him for everything.
So, looking at the Hull board, I'm guessing Peacock is your choice for pin the blame on the scapegoat and 'rumblings'?

Re: Next Coach : Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:44 pm  

hull2524 wrote:

Whats miller got to do with c. chester?

Everything. You may find this concept difficult so I will type slowly to assist your though process. Miller failed at your club yet is thriving at another. So, your decision to send him on his way has proved to be good for both parties, the kid clearly needed a change in environment. Exactly the same with Chester. He needed a change too and in the long run both Chris and Rovers will be much better for the decision.

hull2524 wrote:

you got rid of him because certain people thought he was the reason behind your form

No, we got rid because we'd been rubbish since about May last year. If by "certain people" you mean 99.9% of the support base, then maybe you are right.

Re: Next Coach : Sun Apr 10, 2016 6:02 pm  

yea ok if you say so,you carry on believing that,

Re: Next Coach : Sun Apr 10, 2016 6:04 pm  

hull2524 wrote:

yea ok if you say so,you carry on believing that,

Believe in what exactly, please explain (this should be good)

Re: Next Coach : Sun Apr 10, 2016 6:06 pm  

Believe that chester was the reason you where struggling,not hard to understand is it,

Re: Next Coach : Sun Apr 10, 2016 6:08 pm  

barham red wrote:

Believe in what exactly, please explain (this should be good)

Your teams gash you ditched the coach, it's still gash. Miller was not what radders wanted so he binned him off, we got Sneyd & Pryce, we are heading in the right direction....you keeping up?