: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:21 pm  

sandy wrote:

:CLAP:

totally agree mate, if you was in the queue at craven park I must have been a couple of people behind you!

One thing this has done for the first time for me since I went to my first game in 1979, is think about willingly missing a rovers game. I reckon I'll still make good friday but with all this rubbish going on I may well miss my first game in 5 years (including all friendlies) when the dicky horne game goes ahead in feb, he and Hull FC can ram it.

Cheers, yes I was in the Craven Park queue. Luckily some good banter with those in the queue near me made it not too unpleasant an experience but I know what you mean.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:53 pm  

sandy wrote:

:CLAP:

totally agree mate, if you was in the queue at craven park I must have been a couple of people behind you!

One thing this has done for the first time for me since I went to my first game in 1979, is think about willingly missing a rovers game. I reckon I'll still make good friday but with all this rubbish going on I may well miss my first game in 5 years (including all friendlies) when the dicky horne game goes ahead in feb, he and Hull FC can ram it. :evil:

I can see this being the view of most Rovers supporters
Thats one game i will give a wide berth to

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:54 pm  

roversmad wrote:

I can see this being the view of most Rovers supporters
Thats one game i will give a wide berth to

Part Timers.

: Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:56 pm  

The Kings of Hull wrote:

Part Timers.

Were you sat there waiting?
get a life FFS

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:30 am  

roversmad wrote:

Were you sat there waiting?
get a life FFS

If your club cannot communicate on the Sunday at craven park that only half the allocation was available on Monday then that isnt Hull FC's fault

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:11 am  

Irregs #16 wrote:

If your club cannot communicate on the Sunday at craven park that only half the allocation was available on Monday then that isnt Hull FC's fault

Their comms manager must have been one of the redundancies!

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:13 am  

If rovers knew this was the case then why not hold on to the tickets until the remaining allocation has arrived. They know the tickets will sell so could of laid the money out up front to Hull to cover the full allocation.They would get it back in a day. Now they have left themselves with loads of extra work collecting names and numbers to distribute the tickets.

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:22 am  

Forever FC wrote:

If rovers knew this was the case then why not hold on to the tickets until the remaining allocation has arrived. They know the tickets will sell so could of laid the money out up front to Hull to cover the full allocation.They would get it back in a day. Now they have left themselves with loads of extra work collecting names and numbers to distribute the tickets.

Ive got friends that are rovers fans and they have talked about the incompetence of their shop before, especially in relation to the distribution of their new shirts etc.

Think rather than looking to blame FC they should start to look at their own to find where things are going wrong.

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:34 am  

Forever FC wrote:

If rovers knew this was the case then why not hold on to the tickets until the remaining allocation has arrived. They know the tickets will sell so could of laid the money out up front to Hull to cover the full allocation.They would get it back in a day. Now they have left themselves with loads of extra work collecting names and numbers to distribute the tickets.

This is were Hull FC's fault comes into it, they only sent the number they did and wouldn't let Rovers have anymore until they were sold apparently so holding onto them until more arrived wasn't an option, they had to sell them first. As I have said this is a situation that has developed over the last couple of years and is the fault of both clubs IMO.

: Wed Mar 18, 2009 9:35 am  

Dicky Ticker wrote:

This is were Hull FC's fault comes into it, they only sent the number they did and wouldn't let Rovers have anymore until they were sold apparently so holding onto them until more arrived wasn't an option, they had to sell them first. As I have said this is a situation that has developed over the last couple of years and is the fault of both clubs IMO.

Theres only 1 club that didnt pay their bill to the other!