Re: Danny McGuire : Wed Oct 11, 2017 10:00 am  

He's a champion player. Wish him all the best at your place over the next two years.

If he plays anything like he did last Saturday - you're in for a treat!

Re: Danny McGuire : Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:04 pm  

Mcguire has been one of if not the player I've enjoyed watching the most in the SL era, it will be quite strange watching him play for another side - I may have to adopt you guys as my second team as I hope he end his career playing well.

He can leave his few poor games of the season for when you play us though.

Re: Danny McGuire : Wed Oct 11, 2017 5:11 pm  

fun time frankie wrote:

Since you told us how bad McGuire is and how the new messiah is doing i.e. CC winners medal nominated for MOS not that anyone remembers that etc McGuire went on to win a semi final carrying Kelly around in his pocket then went on to win his 8th grand final and the MOM award not bad going for a fanny as you put it

Jake the peg , what a tool !

Not only did he have Kelly in his back pocket , but found room for Sneyd and Gale as well !

Produced his second half back masterclass in as many finals ,

I sincerely hope he continues to perform at this level and does Rovers and himself proud .

Re: Danny McGuire : Thu Oct 12, 2017 5:53 am  

Leeds Thirteen wrote:

Jake the peg , what a tool !

Not only did he have Kelly in his back pocket , but found room for Sneyd and Gale as well !

Produced his second half back masterclass in as many finals ,

I sincerely hope he continues to perform at this level and does Rovers and himself proud .

Another new member for my fan club

Re: Danny McGuire : Thu Oct 12, 2017 12:22 pm  

Player T TA TK MT MI TB AT C M AG CB DR E FT G MG OF P

Player A 0 0 26 3 5 4 1 14 93 6.64 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0
Player B 0 1 24 1 3 1 10 5 27 5.40 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 1


2 players. Apparently 1 had the other one in his pocket so it would be easy to tell who is who.

Answers from our resident gurus on here please.

Re: Danny McGuire : Thu Oct 12, 2017 12:43 pm  

Erik the not red wrote:

Player T TA TK MT MI TB AT C M AG CB DR E FT G MG OF P

Player A 0 0 26 3 5 4 1 14 93 6.64 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0
Player B 0 1 24 1 3 1 10 5 27 5.40 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 1


2 players. Apparently 1 had the other one in his pocket so it would be easy to tell who is who.

Answers from our resident gurus on here please.

You bring out the stats McGuire brings out his medals

Re: Danny McGuire : Thu Oct 12, 2017 12:43 pm  

Erik the not red wrote:

Player T TA TK MT MI TB AT C M AG CB DR E FT G MG OF P

Player A 0 0 26 3 5 4 1 14 93 6.64 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0
Player B 0 1 24 1 3 1 10 5 27 5.40 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 1


2 players. Apparently 1 had the other one in his pocket so it would be easy to tell who is who.

Answers from our resident gurus on here please.

Awwww. but but.....the stats say....

[Mild Rover]

Re: Danny McGuire : Thu Oct 12, 2017 12:45 pm  

Erik the not red wrote:

Player T TA TK MT MI TB AT C M AG CB DR E FT G MG OF P

Player A 0 0 26 3 5 4 1 14 93 6.64 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0
Player B 0 1 24 1 3 1 10 5 27 5.40 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 1


2 players. Apparently 1 had the other one in his pocket so it would be easy to tell who is who.

Answers from our resident gurus on here please.

It is very difficult to refute this evidence. Primarily owing to it being such a struggle to read it. On my tablet at least. Please sort out the formatting of your table, ideally including definitions of abbreviations in a footnote. This might best be done in Word, and then you can take a screen grab or snip. When it is legible, I'll be happy to a) marvel at your insight, or b) point out the flaws in your thinking.

Re: Danny McGuire : Thu Oct 12, 2017 12:46 pm  

Erik the not red wrote:

Player T TA TK MT MI TB AT C M AG CB DR E FT G MG OF P

Player A 0 0 26 3 5 4 1 14 93 6.64 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0
Player B 0 1 24 1 3 1 10 5 27 5.40 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 1


2 players. Apparently 1 had the other one in his pocket so it would be easy to tell who is who.

Answers from our resident gurus on here please.

it is hard to tell by those numbers so they got some forensic evidence, and a couple of strands of ginger hair were found in his shorts when mrs McGuire did the washing

Re: Danny McGuire : Thu Oct 12, 2017 1:32 pm  

Erik the not red wrote:

Player T TA TK MT MI TB AT C M AG CB DR E FT G MG OF P

Player A 0 0 26 3 5 4 1 14 93 6.64 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0
Player B 0 1 24 1 3 1 10 5 27 5.40 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 1


2 players. Apparently 1 had the other one in his pocket so it would be easy to tell who is who.

Answers from our resident gurus on here please.

On this evidence there has obviously been a mistake in the result of the Semi Final, you must have beaten us after all and I'm sure the SL will pop round with "your" trophy just as soon as they stop laughing

Back in reality, good to see you guys back in SL, Danny will do a great job for you, hopefully excepting when he faces the Rhinos. Been a pleasure to watch him in the Blue and Amber