Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Oct 29, 2016 3:19 pm  

Roggenrola wrote:

Yeah I know you are

Having a quick scroll through your previous posts, I think its rather obvious who's obsessed.

Anyhow, sign kelly on a one year deal. Hes class in his first year,its the second when it all goes tatties up.

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Oct 29, 2016 3:22 pm  

supersuperfc wrote:

Having a quick scroll through your previous posts, I think its rather obvious who's obsessed.

Anyhow, sign kelly on a one year deal. Hes class in his first year,its the second when it all goes tatties up.

If I was obsessed I would be on duller page not on rovers forum unlike some.

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Oct 29, 2016 3:25 pm  

The Kells we saw glimpses of was exceptional unfortunately the more usual one is a fat waste of space.

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Oct 29, 2016 3:26 pm  

Roggenrola wrote:

If I was obsessed I would be on duller page not on rovers forum unlike some.

Yeah I agree, seems good business for hull gettin him for a year, on a fraction of what he was on.

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Oct 29, 2016 3:31 pm  

easthull fc fan wrote:

He will be fine we have staff who will bring out the best of him, plus he will be at the top end of the league winning games so that will make it easier for him, can't have been easy getting beat every week.

He's hardly changing scenery. Just another club in hull. Leopards never change their spots, no matter how good your coaching team is. All I'll say is 'good luck'. You're going to need it.

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Oct 29, 2016 3:36 pm  

supersuperfc wrote:

Yeah I agree, seems good business for hull gettin him for a year, on a fraction of what he was on.

9/10's is a fraction, that would be my guess, what's your wild stab in the dark?

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Oct 29, 2016 3:38 pm  

SirStan wrote:

9/10's is a fraction, that would be my guess, what's your wild stab in the dark?

Ooh you've put me on the spot you little stinker!

Hmmmm......

4/7's
Bargain

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Oct 29, 2016 3:49 pm  

He was on 250k at Rovers , apparently

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Oct 29, 2016 3:50 pm  

Chester Wednesday wrote:

He was on 250k at Rovers , apparently

2/7's then

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Oct 29, 2016 3:51 pm  

Oooh fractions. I'll go for 22/7 because that's pi(e).