Re: larroyer charged : Mon Jul 20, 2015 10:06 pm  

mk_fc wrote:

If you do get the chance you can see in the tackles building up to it that he is pumped about something...

Someone said something nasty about his citroen 2cv

Re: larroyer charged : Mon Jul 20, 2015 10:08 pm  

Rural Robin wrote:

I must admit, I haven't seen the game back and didn't see the Larroyer incident at the time... What I did see however is watts take Kelly out arguably late but with a definite shoulder charge with not even a caution. That is the sort of thing that gets me frustrated. And it's not just when Rovers are involved, they are as a bunch bloody useless.

watts wasn't a shoulder charge, nor was it late or he'd have been dragged before the beak. We've had far worse out of the disciplinary panel than rovers have this season.

As for larroyer, he should have whatever ban he gets doubled for running away

Re: larroyer charged : Mon Jul 20, 2015 10:53 pm  

Jake the Peg wrote:

Someone said something nasty about his citroen 2cv

Ever considered a career in comedy Rolfie? No, thought not.

Re: larroyer charged : Tue Jul 21, 2015 12:24 am  

Jake the Peg wrote:

watts wasn't a shoulder charge, nor was it late or he'd have been dragged before the beak. We've had far worse out of the disciplinary panel than rovers have this season.

As for larroyer, he should have whatever ban he gets doubled for running away

Not a shoulder charge? Watts didn't even get penalised for it, and it lead to your 1st try.
And what are you talking about, "we've had far worse out of the disciplinary than Rovers"-
Maybe your players haven't been as disciplined as ours, would be the simple answer.
Although 1 of your players recently had a charge downgraded so don't think you can complain

Re: larroyer charged : Tue Jul 21, 2015 1:28 am  

Jake the Peg wrote:

watts wasn't a shoulder charge, nor was it late or he'd have been dragged before the beak. We've had far worse out of the disciplinary panel than rovers have this season.

As for larroyer, he should have whatever ban he gets doubled for running away

I think you've just stooped to a new low of stupidity with that first bit about Watts!! What have you been taking to think that wasn't a shoulder charge? Are you actually Stevo?

Re: larroyer charged : Tue Jul 21, 2015 7:29 am  

bob bob bobin robin wrote:

I think you've just stooped to a new low of stupidity with that first bit about Watts!! What have you been taking to think that wasn't a shoulder charge? Are you actually Stevo?

As can be seen from the photo above it clearly isn't a shoulder charge. Good, legitimate hit

Re: larroyer charged : Tue Jul 21, 2015 7:40 am  

Should have been a penalty, shoulder charge, but not late as was committed as seen from the picture

Larroyer was much worst and deserves a ban, so the RFL got it correct.

Re: larroyer charged : Tue Jul 21, 2015 9:25 am  

Dave K. wrote:

Should have been a penalty, shoulder charge, but not late as was committed as seen from the picture

Larroyer was much worst and deserves a ban, so the RFL got it correct.

Watts' wasn't a shoulder charge! There was no rotation of the hips and an attempt was there to raise the arm. It was a great shot, that's why there's no charge.

Re: larroyer charged : Tue Jul 21, 2015 10:20 am  

Jake the Peg wrote:

As can be seen from the photo above it clearly isn't a shoulder charge. Good, legitimate hit

Ha ha ha, of course it is,

Re: larroyer charged : Tue Jul 21, 2015 10:24 am  

*1865* wrote:

Watts' wasn't a shoulder charge! There was no rotation of the hips and an attempt was there to raise the arm. It was a great shot, that's why there's no charge.

And you're clearly just as blinkered as Jake. It was a clear penalty with initial contact being with the shoulder, his left hip also clearly comes forward into the tackle. FWIW Larroyer deserves a ban for his, not saying he doesn't, but Watts' was also a shoulder charge that at the least deserved a penalty, but agree no ban required.