Walker Ban Upheld : Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:00 pm  

http://www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=rleague/09/02/18/RUGBYL_Hull_KR_Nightlead.html

http://www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=rleague/09/02/18/RUGBYL_Hull_KR_Nightlead.html

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:05 pm  

No real surprise there then. Lets move on now and focus on friday, not exactly too bad having the likes of Webster stepping in to replace him is it.

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:06 pm  

We've seen it all before

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 6:18 pm  

I doubt very much you was at Odsal Hutchie so cut out the wind ups.
GML.

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:34 pm  

bob bob bobin robin wrote:

No real surprise there then. Lets move on now and focus on friday, not exactly too bad having the likes of Webster stepping in to replace him is it.

With regards to the ban of Chev walker been upheld,
the inconsistencies that were evident last year by the RFL show no signs of receeding, it realy is about time they got their house in order and at least try to show some consistency when punishuing players for so called bad tackles.
It will be interesting to see what punishments are given out when Leeds or st Helens players are up in front of the pannel.
Once again the RFL at red hall have shown themselves to be the laughing stock of sport.
Rugby league, is the best sport in the world but unfortunately its still run by muppets,

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:41 pm  

Although Chev has looked good so far this season this is by no means a big problem.
Who can complain at having to play Jake Webster?

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 8:37 pm  

Seventies red wrote:

With regards to the ban of Chev walker been upheld,
the inconsistencies that were evident last year by the RFL show no signs of receeding, it realy is about time they got their house in order and at least try to show some consistency when punishuing players for so called bad tackles.
It will be interesting to see what punishments are given out when Leeds or st Helens players are up in front of the pannel.
Once again the RFL at red hall have shown themselves to be the laughing stock of sport.
Rugby league, is the best sport in the world but unfortunately its still run by muppets,

what about the Leeds/Celtic brawl??? anyone punished for all the striking there? thought not.

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:05 pm  

Hull KR have certainly made huge strides when one GB international is replaced by a NZ international with a cracking top class local lad putting pressure on both of them for a starting berth.

: Thu Feb 19, 2009 8:29 am  

Seventies red wrote:

With regards to the ban of Chev walker been upheld,
the inconsistencies that were evident last year by the RFL show no signs of receeding, it realy is about time they got their house in order and at least try to show some consistency when punishuing players for so called bad tackles.
It will be interesting to see what punishments are given out when Leeds or st Helens players are up in front of the pannel.
Once again the RFL at red hall have shown themselves to be the laughing stock of sport.
Rugby league, is the best sport in the world but unfortunately its still run by muppets,

This link was posted on the VT. Kind of goes against your opinion, but lets not let the facts get in the way

: Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:43 pm  

Irregs #16 wrote: This link was posted on the VT. Kind of goes against your opinion, but lets not let the facts get in the way Courtesy of Gazemous: Percentage of games banned for in relation to players referred to disciplinary panel: Wakefield - 4 times referred, 8 matches banned: 200% Castleford - 5 times referred, 8 matches banned: 160% Wigan - 12 times referred, 12 matches banned: 100% St Helens - 3 times referred, 3 matches banned: 100% Quins - 9 times referred, 8 matches banned: 89% Catalans - 9 times referred, 8 matches banned: 89% Hudds - 7 times referred, 6 matches banned: 86% Warrington - 10 times referred, 8 matches banned: 80% Leeds - 8 times referred, 5 matches banned: 63% Bradford - 5 times referred, 3 matches banned: 60% Hull KR - 11 times referred, 4 matches banned: 36% Hull FC - 2 times referred, 0 matches banned: 0%

Irregs #16 wrote: This link was posted on the VT. Kind of goes against your opinion, but lets not let the facts get in the way Courtesy of Gazemous: Percentage of games banned for in relation to players referred to disciplinary panel: Wakefield - 4 times referred, 8 matches banned: 200% Castleford - 5 times referred, 8 matches banned: 160% Wigan - 12 times referred, 12 matches banned: 100% St Helens - 3 times referred, 3 matches banned: 100% Quins - 9 times referred, 8 matches banned: 89% Catalans - 9 times referred, 8 matches banned: 89% Hudds - 7 times referred, 6 matches banned: 86% Warrington - 10 times referred, 8 matches banned: 80% Leeds - 8 times referred, 5 matches banned: 63% Bradford - 5 times referred, 3 matches banned: 60% Hull KR - 11 times referred, 4 matches banned: 36% Hull FC - 2 times referred, 0 matches banned: 0%