Re: Hicks : Thu Feb 25, 2016 12:36 pm  

I don't get the animosity against Hicks. Admittedly he was bad on Sunday but for both teams but If you look at our win ratio with him as the Ref, it is better than with any other referee.

Re: Hicks : Thu Feb 25, 2016 1:47 pm  

LifeLongHKRFan wrote:

I don't get the animosity against Hicks. Admittedly he was bad on Sunday but for both teams but If you look at our win ratio with him as the Ref, it is better than with any other referee.

... historically I bet he's officiated a higher percentage of the 'lower profile games' for us. Which means the winnable games in general.
Whatever the actual stats suggest, I still don't think he's a particular competent referee yet.

Re: Hicks : Thu Feb 25, 2016 3:01 pm  

Hessle Roader wrote:

Well we've got him tonight. So if we lose its his fault and if we win he's had a belter.

It was our fault we lost, my post was about Hick as a ref.

Re: Hicks : Thu Feb 25, 2016 4:07 pm  

Hessle Roader wrote:

Well we've got him tonight. So if we lose its his fault and if we win he's had a belter.

It's academic now who got the worst from that bag of sh!!!t Hicks, lets hope he does not spoil the game tonight, mind you if you lose won't that be Radfords fault?

Re: Hicks : Fri Feb 26, 2016 5:28 pm  

thought hicks was terrible last night then watched sky today and he didn"t have a bad game (i think emotion has to do with it)