Re: Help thread 2010 : Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:14 pm  

pokerface wrote:

Those are still the top ten teams in your league (wigan), but the numbers represent where they are in the overall league. Don't know if this is intentional or a minor glitch...

I don't think it's intentional, because the numbers don't show overall league positions. For example, my team is ranked 32= overall, but ranked 42= in the Wigan league (and is actually 2= by ranking). The numbers in the local league seem to correspond in the first instance to the row number in the overall league: the top-placed team in the Wigan league is ranked 29 in the Wigan league, and ranked 25= in the overall league, but is row 29 in the overall league. Similarly, "worthingtons RL" is row 42 (rank 32=) in the overall league, and ranked 42= in the Wigan league.

I think the underlying SQL *might* be counting rows from the wrong table when presenting the local league rankings.

Re: Help thread 2010 : Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:19 pm  

yer seen that, the private leagues are counting right though

Re: Help thread 2010 : Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:02 pm  

LeightonP wrote:

I don't think it's intentional, because the numbers don't show overall league positions. For example, my team is ranked 32= overall, but ranked 42= in the Wigan league (and is actually 2= by ranking). The numbers in the local league seem to correspond in the first instance to the row number in the overall league: the top-placed team in the Wigan league is ranked 29 in the Wigan league, and ranked 25= in the overall league, but is row 29 in the overall league. Similarly, "worthingtons RL" is row 42 (rank 32=) in the overall league, and ranked 42= in the Wigan league.

I think the underlying SQL *might* be counting rows from the wrong table when presenting the local league rankings.

Oh yeah I see that now, just had a quik glance earlier to try and give a reason. I stand corrected lol

Re: Help thread 2010 : Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:34 pm  

LeightonP wrote:

I don't think it's intentional, because the numbers don't show overall league positions. For example, my team is ranked 32= overall, but ranked 42= in the Wigan league (and is actually 2= by ranking). The numbers in the local league seem to correspond in the first instance to the row number in the overall league: the top-placed team in the Wigan league is ranked 29 in the Wigan league, and ranked 25= in the overall league, but is row 29 in the overall league. Similarly, "worthingtons RL" is row 42 (rank 32=) in the overall league, and ranked 42= in the Wigan league.

I think the underlying SQL *might* be counting rows from the wrong table when presenting the local league rankings.

I have just gone through this again and I was right first time

In the Rhinos league looks like so:

2 Don's Dest... 48 (overall league 2)
10 my boys 44 (overall league =8)
18 Muppets XI... 41 (overall league =16)
23 Lou's Monk... 39 (overall league 23)

The two middle teams have = and a position number in the overall league, on a spreadsheet this would read as 10 and 18 respectively.

Re: Help thread 2010 : Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:51 pm  

LeightonP wrote:

I don't think it's intentional, because the numbers don't show overall league positions. For example, my team is ranked 32= overall, but ranked 42= in the Wigan league (and is actually 2= by ranking). The numbers in the local league seem to correspond in the first instance to the row number in the overall league: the top-placed team in the Wigan league is ranked 29 in the Wigan league, and ranked 25= in the overall league, but is row 29 in the overall league. Similarly, "worthingtons RL" is row 42 (rank 32=) in the overall league, and ranked 42= in the Wigan league.

I think the underlying SQL *might* be counting rows from the wrong table when presenting the local league rankings.

This has now been fixed.

Re: Help thread 2010 : Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:21 pm  

Grego wrote:

This has now been fixed.

Cheers!

Re: Help thread 2010 : Fri Feb 05, 2010 7:47 pm  

I'm almost certainly being stupid but Kevin Sinfield is showing as having scored 14 points on the crusaders vs Leeds match page, but in my team he scored 12. Counting up I think it's the team page that's wrong but I may be missing something!
Cheers,
Stuart

Re: Help thread 2010 : Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:12 pm  

fcforever111 wrote:

I'm almost certainly being stupid but Kevin Sinfield is showing as having scored 14 points on the crusaders vs Leeds match page, but in my team he scored 12. Counting up I think it's the team page that's wrong but I may be missing something!
Cheers,
Stuart

Read the rules

Re: Help thread 2010 : Fri Feb 05, 2010 9:27 pm  

Stats page says 1 try & 5 goals.

1 try=4 points
5 goals=5 points
being in starting 17=1 point
being on winning side=2 points
which as I said adds up to 12 points and is correct on my page.

so why does report of match shows him as having 14 points? Unless that refers to actual points scored not fantasy league points scored. In which case I was being stupid (as I began my last post) but I HAD read the rules - no need to get shirty!

Re: Help thread 2010 : Fri Feb 05, 2010 11:09 pm  

fcforever111 wrote:

Stats page says 1 try & 5 goals.

1 try=4 points
5 goals=5 points
being in starting 17=1 point
being on winning side=2 points
which as I said adds up to 12 points and is correct on my page.

so why does report of match shows him as having 14 points? Unless that refers to actual points scored not fantasy league points scored. In which case I was being stupid (as I began my last post) but I HAD read the rules - no need to get shirty!

Because he scored a try and 5 goals? I wasn't being 'shirty' at all, I had assumed that it would be fairly obvious to everyone that SLStats corresponds to real life rather than a Fantasy competition.