: Sat Mar 07, 2009 8:18 pm  

Scruton in for Nash.

: Sat Mar 07, 2009 8:18 pm  

efcrhino wrote:

Thinking of taking Donald out depending on tommorow's performance.

Donald for Hall +140k
S. Gleeson for Dixon -90k
Nash for a good prop ...

How much will you have for a prop?

: Sat Mar 07, 2009 8:21 pm  

LS14 RHINO wrote:

How much will you have for a prop?

50k. Scruton 135k in for Nash 85k

: Sat Mar 07, 2009 8:21 pm  

efcrhino wrote:

Scruton in for Nash.

Oh please. To get 1 point a week, Burgess is cheaper and at least Leeds win.

: Sat Mar 07, 2009 8:22 pm  

LS14 RHINO wrote:

Oh please. To get 1 point a week, Burgess is cheaper and at least Leeds win.

I'll think about it

: Sat Mar 07, 2009 8:24 pm  

For me Sykes and Godwin out. And a quality centre (not sure who yet) and Randall in.

: Sat Mar 07, 2009 8:25 pm  

efcrhino wrote:

I'll think about it

Think about it, not many props score tries so at least get one whose gonna be on the winning team more often than not. Whats Scruton got so far 4 points from 3 games. Burgess has got 9 from 3.

: Sat Mar 07, 2009 8:27 pm  

Huby must have a reasonable amount of points for a cheap prop.

: Sat Mar 07, 2009 8:30 pm  

~ No1 Saints Fan ~ wrote:

For me Sykes and Godwin out. And a quality centre (not sure who yet) and Randall in.

Nero, M Gleeson. They'll keep your low scoring team a low scoring one.

Why buck the trend of having overpriced, low scoring centres.

: Sat Mar 07, 2009 8:31 pm  

~ No1 Saints Fan ~ wrote:

Huby must have a reasonable amount of points for a cheap prop.

Huby is a possibility actually. Could go for Gafa on the wing then.