Re: Friendly v Hull KR. : Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:48 pm  

Keiththered wrote:

Why did Radford believe that a team with so little experience and proven ability at that level believe they were on a par with our team?

LR was referring to the last 15 minutes (when Abdull and Lunt were bound to make a difference).

Re: Friendly v Hull KR. : Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:57 pm  

ccs wrote:

LR was referring to the last 15 minutes (when Abdull and Lunt were bound to make a difference).

But it is a well known fact that the last quarter of any match is the time when the superior team presses forward with their advantage. We should know we suffered enough last year. Radford should not have been surprised either. If he fielded his weakest team in the crucial period of the game he got what he should have expected.

Re: Friendly v Hull KR. : Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:00 pm  

Keiththered wrote:

Not giddy at all, merely posting what Radford said. Yes we are a Championship side but you have no idea where we will be next year. I hope your previous 9109 posts were rather more considered than this one and not just more trolling trying to make childish points

I really can't remember the content of my previous posts tbh, bit of a mixed bag I guess. On the subject of posting history it's good to see you back on here, it's been a while hasn't it. What brought you back?

Re: Friendly v Hull KR. : Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:12 pm  

Keiththered wrote:

Radford should not have been surprised either. If he fielded his weakest team in the crucial period of the game he got what he should have expected.

But LR was hoping for a better performance in the last 15 minutes, so he didn't get what he expected.

Re: Friendly v Hull KR. : Wed Jan 11, 2017 3:17 pm  

a

ccs wrote:

But LR was hoping for a better performance in the last 15 minutes, so he didn't get what he expected.

Hope and expectation are not the same thing. You can live in hope without any expectation. Last season I travelled to our matches always hoping for a win but often without any expectation of a good result. Maybe that's what Radders did on Sunday.

Re: Friendly v Hull KR. : Wed Jan 11, 2017 3:48 pm  

It was a friendly. Bit to much over analysis I think.

Re: Friendly v Hull KR. : Wed Jan 11, 2017 4:17 pm  

Keiththered wrote:

Not giddy at all, merely posting what Radford said. Yes we are a Championship side but you have no idea where we will be next year. I hope your previous 9109 posts were rather more considered than this one and not just more trolling trying to make childish points

Hardly trolling when he's on his own team's forum.

Re: Friendly v Hull KR. : Wed Jan 11, 2017 4:18 pm  

Smiggs wrote:

I really can't remember the content of my previous posts tbh, bit of a mixed bag I guess. On the subject of posting history it's good to see you back on here, it's been a while hasn't it. What brought you back?

Need you ask Smiggs. The Dobbins came here to gloat about beating an academy side.

Re: Friendly v Hull KR. : Wed Jan 11, 2017 4:30 pm  

Hessle Roader wrote:

Hardly trolling when he's on his own team's forum.

Trolling is to send or submit a provocative email or posting with the intention of provoking or inciting an angry response according to the Oxford Dictionary. The type of forum or subject is irrelevant The post obviously had that intent. You obviously did not know the correct meaning of the word. You can take my pointing out your ignorance as trolling if you wish.

Re: Friendly v Hull KR. : Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:32 pm  

Keiththered wrote:

Trolling is to send or submit a provocative email or posting with the intention of provoking or inciting an angry response according to the Oxford Dictionary. The type of forum or subject is irrelevant The post obviously had that intent. You obviously did not know the correct meaning of the word. You can take my pointing out your ignorance as trolling if you wish.

When I need your advice on any subject then I will know I'm in trouble. Off you go and discuss Rovers matters on Rovers board.